Fines clampdown ‘will hit innocent drivers’
Let me get this straight.
Without due process or any burden of proof being established,
someone's rightful property can be seized and impounded against
their proving they are innocent?
And the justification for this being it's 'needed to help tackle the problem of unpaid congestion charges by drivers registered outside London.'
Now, what if Gordon Brown phoned them up and suggested a fellow
Ministerial colleague's Caravan-tower was in breach?
Why don't they just line-up against the wall and shoot each other?
It would save the rest of us the job.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.