Monday, March 19, 2007

It must be true. I read it in the paper.

High hopes

'...the agreement's dirty little secret: it will do next to no good, and again at very high cost'

Oo-er. Careful with that. I rather suspect this will be the next flames begin!

I recently decided to have no more to do with the arguments over climate change, and concentrate instead on doing what I can personally and to encourage others - via objective information, entertainment and reward - to simply cut back on unnecessary waste and reduce consumption wherever reasonably possible.

Addendum to a reply:

'With
so little making sense in this arena, at least even I could grasp your explanation.

It may even help assess what's being said by the various merry crews a tad better for validity.

As a mere graduate in Civil Engineering (BSc, but only on the strict promise I would not try and build anything, so I went into advertising. At least I can still figure out dodgy numbers), but with a Brigadier Generality in BS, hype & spin (field commissions), I know what I know, and I know what I don't know.

And I also know when others are in the same boat. It's a shame they can't admit it.

We'd get more DONE that way:)





Guardian - The water of discontent




No comments:

Post a Comment

I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.

Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.

I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.