The climate change movement must be inclusive
At first I thought this a sentiment worth checking further. Then I read on...
'The climate change movement must be inclusive
The climate change movement must broaden its social base ...'
I'd say a good place for change might be your terminology. What on Earth is 'the climate change movement'. I don't recognise it, it doesn't make much sense and I don't very much like the sound of it.
A vast swathe of what ifs and must be done, with almost zero tangibles on what and how, especially in terms to engage and inspire those not so blessed to feed in the Westminster political or Islington media trough.
And that last para is priceless, showing our current leadership's true grasp of the issues and mindsets of those they claim to represent.
Par for the course, mind.
Addendum:
I have a fair idea what the responses from Dalston and Stoke Newington might be, but as an insider what do you reckon the deep thoughts on this might be from No.10?
Britain's Dirty Business
You guys get paid to come up with stuff like this, and then more to opine on how the general public are not getting with the 'green' programme?
Or is this another left-hand, right-hand minor issue that has slipped passed our elected representatives. I'm betting 10p it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.