Sometimes, I think the 'green' media rather lose the plot.
What's the carbon cost of the online reaction to Michael Jackson's death?
When they are not being, possibly, total hypocrites (and a tad insensitive).
Maybe the BBC could get on the case?
I think Newsnight's Ethical Man has a colleague well placed...
Next time, Jacko, try to die in London*
Bless.
I know it was just a question. But the irony of online eco-breast beating about the online costs of 'stuff' being reported was rather rich.
And yes, I see the irony of me adding to this still further. But I think there are areas that, just possibly, set back the notion of sensible environmental progress.
*The further irony of which publicaion has penned this is also not lost on me.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.