Thanks for this: And the winner is...
I'll have to check but I have a vague notion I submitted, and paid money to do so. Or was it for the main site on the Webbies?
Makes you think. All's fair and all, and certainly if it's still the best then it deserves the accolade.
But who decides? And who checks? And who judges the judges?
Maybe they just got that Ch 5 production company to handle it, pocketed the saving and decided to just go with what worked before with a few tweaks.
My faith in the workings of awards shows is about on a par with TV contests.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.