Or, equally, another from 'not all that is green can be viewed in black and white'.
The breaking news the BBC wouldn't tell
I do confess that I am finding science, and logic, take rather lower fiddle ranks to agenda and ratings-driven hype.
By any measure I would rather this job was done in an accredited yard for good money, rather than by a bunch of kids cheap on a distant beach.
As to this... 'In 2004 Liam Sheahan of Ready Creek, Victoria, famously lost $100,000 when he was prosecuted for felling 247 trees to protect his property. Last week his house was the only one in the area left standing.' Head-shaking is not enough. I guess he got a form of refund in that he still has a home. In this era of sorry folk left right and centre, I'm betting even an apology will be hard to screw out of those responsible.
In the frame of mind to wonder what else I am told, or not, just watching the Breakfast News, this cranked an eyebrow:
BBC - Global warming 'underestimated'
I dread to think what lies behind such stuff any more (This is 'a' scientist, and a few other blogs I read have pointed out that his area of expertise is not really in this area, yet I am sure he was introduced as 'a leading climate change expert'). Especially as, irony-free, it was followed by this spot, with the teleprompter readers and their guest pretty much agreeing it was awful, and people better fly now or lose out:
BBC - Flyers face losing their Airmiles
And in closing, here's one from the other day, just to put what the world faces in some kind of context:
Telegraph - China's rescue plan a load of spin?
Addendum:
The Register - Thermageddon, the BBC and a giant snake
Addendum :
Guardian - Scientists must rein in misleading climate change claims - Read beyond the headline (which rather neatly makes a point in its framing). Indeed, read beyond the article. Woah! I'm glad I just try and help reduce waste.
Guardian - The tropics on fire: scientist's grim vision of global warming - Same paper; same day.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Friday, February 13, 2009
It's long, but worth it...
No, missus, oo-er, trust me.
You know how 'they' are 'listening' to 'us'.
I followed, and even ended up sharing in an exchange from some guys who do seem to know stuff...
Stakeholder Engagement: The Big Energy Shift
Government intend these to be active and open consultation processes,
and are keen to hear from the households, businesses and communities who
will be affected by the proposals. Government also needs to hear from
local government, community groups, NGOs and the supply chain and
installation companies that will support delivery on the ground.
Government is launching the 'Big Energy Shift' - a series of 40+
road-show events in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland,
involving citizens, businesses, local authorities, community and fuel
poverty groups and the supply chain. Participants will discuss options
for heat and energy savings in homes and communities. These events
will provide the opportunity to discuss the consultations before
formally responding.
Events include:
* Stakeholder workshops on the detail of CESP on the 24 March, and
CERT on the 25 March, hosted by the Energy Efficiency Partnership for
Homes. These events are by invitation only, and these will be issued in
late February;
* Stakeholder workshops in Scotland and Wales on the
consultations, working with the Welsh and Scottish Governments. Further
details will follow, but you can also register your interest by
emailing: cesp.consultation@decc.gsi.gov.uk;
* English Regional "Road-show" events on the consultations, with a
particular focus on CESP. Further details will follow. Spaces will be
limited, however you can register your interest by emailing:
cesp.consultation@decc.gsi.gov.uk;
* A HES workshop on community and renewable heat in local
communities with local authorities - details are to be made available
shortly. For further information contact
hes.consultation@decc.gsi.gov.uk;
* Citizens forums for households and communities - an innovative
programme with 9 separate citizens' forums - involving 250 people - in
neighbourhoods in England, Wales and N Ireland. These will include
peer-to-peer interviews in the community, site visits to see different
technologies in practice, and home visits as well as interactive web
forum. The events will take place throughout February and March;
* Small and medium enterprises - events run in conjunction with
Business in the Community and the Small Business Consortium, to discuss
policy and delivery options;
* Public sector - an event run with the Sustainable Development
Commission to bring together public sector procurers, facility managers
etc, to explore their role in delivering changes in relation to heat,
energy saving, and renewable energy.
The latter three events are invitation only. The findings will be
published by DECC.
> The first sentence in this press release is totally negated by the actual
> details of the "consultation" events, which are all, apparently, labelled
> as "by invitation" or "limited places" - must be some meaning of the word
> "open" that I haven't heard before. This carries on from a fine tradition
> of the government that brought us "Do you want a dozen nuclear power
> stations or only twelve?" and "Sipson village is being dangerously polluted
> by aircraft from Heathrow Airport, don't you think we ought to move it?"
>
> I suppose it's not possible to boycott all such government charades
> totally? Is this what they want? How could we ensure that no one broke the
> picket line?
It gets even better; the HES workshop email address doesn't work.I've tried to ask for further information, from two different email addresses and they both were rejected. The message:
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
seems to refer back to an old Elvis number,
"Return to sender, address unknown.
No such number, no such zone."
Rather than a picket line, we need a powerful can opener.
Genius!
Getting with the 'game', I'll leave it open as to which bits - the semantic jiggery-pokery, the Hitch-hikers Guidian 'directions'... or the incisive mockery - I am referring in that statement.
I have a feeling, as with some West End Theatres, I how the authorities' PR machine would plaster that statement on any post(er).
It was about another issue, but I am minded to share a comment by a chap in the Newsnight blog today that I thought would make a great URL: 'itwasntme.gov'
It also goes a long way to why I consider almost an 'research' that leads to a 'poll' that most, and especially HMG and the BBC, carry out to be pretty suspect.
You know how 'they' are 'listening' to 'us'.
I followed, and even ended up sharing in an exchange from some guys who do seem to know stuff...
Stakeholder Engagement: The Big Energy Shift
Government intend these to be active and open consultation processes,
and are keen to hear from the households, businesses and communities who
will be affected by the proposals. Government also needs to hear from
local government, community groups, NGOs and the supply chain and
installation companies that will support delivery on the ground.
Government is launching the 'Big Energy Shift' - a series of 40+
road-show events in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland,
involving citizens, businesses, local authorities, community and fuel
poverty groups and the supply chain. Participants will discuss options
for heat and energy savings in homes and communities. These events
will provide the opportunity to discuss the consultations before
formally responding.
Events include:
* Stakeholder workshops on the detail of CESP on the 24 March, and
CERT on the 25 March, hosted by the Energy Efficiency Partnership for
Homes. These events are by invitation only, and these will be issued in
late February;
* Stakeholder workshops in Scotland and Wales on the
consultations, working with the Welsh and Scottish Governments. Further
details will follow, but you can also register your interest by
emailing: cesp.consultation@decc.gsi.gov.uk;
* English Regional "Road-show" events on the consultations, with a
particular focus on CESP. Further details will follow. Spaces will be
limited, however you can register your interest by emailing:
cesp.consultation@decc.gsi.gov.uk;
* A HES workshop on community and renewable heat in local
communities with local authorities - details are to be made available
shortly. For further information contact
hes.consultation@decc.gsi.gov.uk;
* Citizens forums for households and communities - an innovative
programme with 9 separate citizens' forums - involving 250 people - in
neighbourhoods in England, Wales and N Ireland. These will include
peer-to-peer interviews in the community, site visits to see different
technologies in practice, and home visits as well as interactive web
forum. The events will take place throughout February and March;
* Small and medium enterprises - events run in conjunction with
Business in the Community and the Small Business Consortium, to discuss
policy and delivery options;
* Public sector - an event run with the Sustainable Development
Commission to bring together public sector procurers, facility managers
etc, to explore their role in delivering changes in relation to heat,
energy saving, and renewable energy.
The latter three events are invitation only. The findings will be
published by DECC.
> The first sentence in this press release is totally negated by the actual
> details of the "consultation" events, which are all, apparently, labelled
> as "by invitation" or "limited places" - must be some meaning of the word
> "open" that I haven't heard before. This carries on from a fine tradition
> of the government that brought us "Do you want a dozen nuclear power
> stations or only twelve?" and "Sipson village is being dangerously polluted
> by aircraft from Heathrow Airport, don't you think we ought to move it?"
>
> I suppose it's not possible to boycott all such government charades
> totally? Is this what they want? How could we ensure that no one broke the
> picket line?
It gets even better; the HES workshop email address doesn't work.I've tried to ask for further information, from two different email addresses and they both were rejected. The message:
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
seems to refer back to an old Elvis number,
"Return to sender, address unknown.
No such number, no such zone."
Rather than a picket line, we need a powerful can opener.
Genius!
Getting with the 'game', I'll leave it open as to which bits - the semantic jiggery-pokery, the Hitch-hikers Guidian 'directions'... or the incisive mockery - I am referring in that statement.
I have a feeling, as with some West End Theatres, I how the authorities' PR machine would plaster that statement on any post(er).
It was about another issue, but I am minded to share a comment by a chap in the Newsnight blog today that I thought would make a great URL: 'itwasntme.gov'
It also goes a long way to why I consider almost an 'research' that leads to a 'poll' that most, and especially HMG and the BBC, carry out to be pretty suspect.
As some around here have been saying...
'Apocalyptic climate predictions' mislead the public, say experts
Met Office scientists fear distorted climate change claims could undermine efforts to tackle carbon emissions
I am no expert, but... D'uh.
New Scientist - NEW - Scientists losing war of words over climate change - the posts in reply rather make a few points.. sadly.
ADDENDUM - 13/03/07
It seems to be sinking in that there is a problem. This just in from The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM - who are not going to get many visitors from the URL they offer)
The UK’s recent cold weather has highlighted that the often interchangeable use of the terms ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’ leads to public misunderstanding.
Misinterpretation of the suggestive term ‘global warming’ has resulted in some people to propose that cold weather events disproves climate change is happening. Therefore CIWEM is calling for greater clarity in the use of these terms by scientists, environmentalists, other professionals and the media so that the general public is able to distinguish between climate change, global warming and localised, short-term weather events.
Global warming describes the increase in average global temperatures due to rising levels of greenhouse gases, whilst climate change refers to regional conditions such as rain, drought and storm events that relate to a long-term change in the Earth’s climate.
Although the UK is suffering from the coldest winter in 30 years, the current weather is entirely consistent with climate change predictions. In pre-industrial days such extreme cold weather occurred every five years but, with climate change, global temperatures have risen, meaning that we now experience it only every 20 years. And in contrast, China’s drought has left more than four million people without drinking water and 24 million acres of crops damaged; parts of Australia are suffering massive flooding, whilst the south’s drought has aggravated the terrible bush fires that have killed over 130 people; Argentina is suffering the worst drought for 50 years; and Israel suffered the driest January since records began.
CIWEM asks whether the term ‘climate change’ is significantly descriptive of the predicted extreme global weather patterns that we will experience. CIWEM puts forward that more dramatic and resonant terms such as ‘climate churn’ or ‘climate convulsion’ may help people to understand that this will not be a gentle transition which can be ignored.
Nick Reeves, Executive Director of CIWEM, says:
“To apply the term ‘global warming’ to explain all extreme weather events including freezing temperatures, snow and heavy rainfall is careless and will only feed the scepticism of the public and some sections of the media that average temperatures aren’t rising and that the climate isn’t changing. As scientists have predicted we are experiencing, simultaneously, extreme weather events around the world, which are causing unprecedented drought conditions, water scarcity, melting of the polar ice caps, rising sea levels, coastal erosion and flooding. Not only is this evidence of climate change but a more serious problem that should be more accurately described as climate convulsion.”
While I have some sympathy with the dilemma, and applaud the attempt, I have to say that after 'Global warming' and then 'climate change', moving to ‘climate churn’ or ‘climate convulsion’ might not quite suffice. There is a lot of baggage to undo, and a few too many who will be trotting out such new buzz words are those who loaded that baggage on the cart in the first place. Message vs. messengers again.
Met Office scientists fear distorted climate change claims could undermine efforts to tackle carbon emissions
I am no expert, but... D'uh.
New Scientist - NEW - Scientists losing war of words over climate change - the posts in reply rather make a few points.. sadly.
ADDENDUM - 13/03/07
It seems to be sinking in that there is a problem. This just in from The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM - who are not going to get many visitors from the URL they offer)
The UK’s recent cold weather has highlighted that the often interchangeable use of the terms ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’ leads to public misunderstanding.
Misinterpretation of the suggestive term ‘global warming’ has resulted in some people to propose that cold weather events disproves climate change is happening. Therefore CIWEM is calling for greater clarity in the use of these terms by scientists, environmentalists, other professionals and the media so that the general public is able to distinguish between climate change, global warming and localised, short-term weather events.
Global warming describes the increase in average global temperatures due to rising levels of greenhouse gases, whilst climate change refers to regional conditions such as rain, drought and storm events that relate to a long-term change in the Earth’s climate.
Although the UK is suffering from the coldest winter in 30 years, the current weather is entirely consistent with climate change predictions. In pre-industrial days such extreme cold weather occurred every five years but, with climate change, global temperatures have risen, meaning that we now experience it only every 20 years. And in contrast, China’s drought has left more than four million people without drinking water and 24 million acres of crops damaged; parts of Australia are suffering massive flooding, whilst the south’s drought has aggravated the terrible bush fires that have killed over 130 people; Argentina is suffering the worst drought for 50 years; and Israel suffered the driest January since records began.
CIWEM asks whether the term ‘climate change’ is significantly descriptive of the predicted extreme global weather patterns that we will experience. CIWEM puts forward that more dramatic and resonant terms such as ‘climate churn’ or ‘climate convulsion’ may help people to understand that this will not be a gentle transition which can be ignored.
Nick Reeves, Executive Director of CIWEM, says:
“To apply the term ‘global warming’ to explain all extreme weather events including freezing temperatures, snow and heavy rainfall is careless and will only feed the scepticism of the public and some sections of the media that average temperatures aren’t rising and that the climate isn’t changing. As scientists have predicted we are experiencing, simultaneously, extreme weather events around the world, which are causing unprecedented drought conditions, water scarcity, melting of the polar ice caps, rising sea levels, coastal erosion and flooding. Not only is this evidence of climate change but a more serious problem that should be more accurately described as climate convulsion.”
While I have some sympathy with the dilemma, and applaud the attempt, I have to say that after 'Global warming' and then 'climate change', moving to ‘climate churn’ or ‘climate convulsion’ might not quite suffice. There is a lot of baggage to undo, and a few too many who will be trotting out such new buzz words are those who loaded that baggage on the cart in the first place. Message vs. messengers again.
Can Can.... er... 't?
The internet can be useful. Especially at putting you right quickly.
Just now I shared a reuse 'tip' from the site, which has proven quite popular, on another site seeking such.
It's a lid from a cream pot that clips on larger food cans, as a substitute for the bought variety.
Seems I may have committed a boo-boo.
Here I was interested in reuse, when 'elf & safety might trump that.
Here's the Food Standards view on it.
I think, for our purposes, we'll stick with the 1/2 day window in the can. We've done a lot worse.
Just now I shared a reuse 'tip' from the site, which has proven quite popular, on another site seeking such.
It's a lid from a cream pot that clips on larger food cans, as a substitute for the bought variety.
Seems I may have committed a boo-boo.
Here I was interested in reuse, when 'elf & safety might trump that.
Here's the Food Standards view on it.
I think, for our purposes, we'll stick with the 1/2 day window in the can. We've done a lot worse.
The real cost of the TWO E dilemma
Millions face 'stealth tax' on heating bills to subsidise green energy
Not an easy one at all.
However, I do concern myself that, with almost painful inevitably, a lot of the costs are biting earlier and harder where they can least be afforded.
I wish I'd logged it, but I was also surprised to find that energy costs are front-end loaded, so smaller homes using less pay proportionately more. Even though I guess my family home (with heating all day - even the gilet I wear needs a bit of help - as I work here) is a beneficiary, this can't be right.
Not an easy one at all.
However, I do concern myself that, with almost painful inevitably, a lot of the costs are biting earlier and harder where they can least be afforded.
I wish I'd logged it, but I was also surprised to find that energy costs are front-end loaded, so smaller homes using less pay proportionately more. Even though I guess my family home (with heating all day - even the gilet I wear needs a bit of help - as I work here) is a beneficiary, this can't be right.
Keep that eyebrow cocked
Some are genuine efforts, and to be applauded.
Many, still, are not.
A while ago I noticed, and still commend, the Greenwash column in the Guardian authored by Fred Pearce.
I'm not sure he's always fair, but he certainly sets out the cases pretty clearly, and if he does push his case there is usually a commenter who can put the other side.
And there still seems to be some debate as to whether things are getting better or worse.
Certainly, such as the ASA have and still are clamping down on blatant factual falsehoods and even excessive claims. But there are still an awful lot where you really have to cock that eyebrow.
I guess, with my ongoing efforts to 'sell' the RE:tie, which I really believe to be a no-brainer positive enviROI idea for all involved - business, consumer & planet - I am quite sensitive to measures that seem more designed to save the company money than anything else.
Which of course IS good, especially if it is through reduced waste which one presumes may get passed to the consumer, but too often there seems really little end-benefit involved where it matters. And then just has to wonder what all the money on the comms efforts could have been spent on rather than making the business seem to be green.
In passing, I noted this little video by MTV Switch advertised. Kinda cute, but then I hark back to a certain song by Dire Straits (!) that celebrated the conspicuous consumption era of the 80's... 'I want my MTV'. Pretty sure most of us still watching think getting a 50" plasma is still a nifty ambition.
Many, still, are not.
A while ago I noticed, and still commend, the Greenwash column in the Guardian authored by Fred Pearce.
I'm not sure he's always fair, but he certainly sets out the cases pretty clearly, and if he does push his case there is usually a commenter who can put the other side.
And there still seems to be some debate as to whether things are getting better or worse.
Certainly, such as the ASA have and still are clamping down on blatant factual falsehoods and even excessive claims. But there are still an awful lot where you really have to cock that eyebrow.
I guess, with my ongoing efforts to 'sell' the RE:tie, which I really believe to be a no-brainer positive enviROI idea for all involved - business, consumer & planet - I am quite sensitive to measures that seem more designed to save the company money than anything else.
Which of course IS good, especially if it is through reduced waste which one presumes may get passed to the consumer, but too often there seems really little end-benefit involved where it matters. And then just has to wonder what all the money on the comms efforts could have been spent on rather than making the business seem to be green.
In passing, I noted this little video by MTV Switch advertised. Kinda cute, but then I hark back to a certain song by Dire Straits (!) that celebrated the conspicuous consumption era of the 80's... 'I want my MTV'. Pretty sure most of us still watching think getting a 50" plasma is still a nifty ambition.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
The 'Great British Refurb'
News of this announcement was leaked last week so most of the content, as summarised in The Guardian, is not overtly surprising.
"All (anyone want to bet that that's not true?) UK households will have a green makeover by 2030 under government plans to reduce carbon emissions and cut energy bills.
Firstly, yet again, these are seen only as targets. Another all process initiative with little productive output other than the favoured box-ticking exercises?
Secondly, if you read it carefully, you will see that the funding is to be provided via a levy on the utility providers, which, as previous attempts at similar initiatives have shown, simply means that, in the end, we pay for it out of our own pockets anyway!
As my Granddad used to say years ago - 'You get nowt for nowt in this life'.
Let's hope that we genuinely get some real 'doing' this time, rather than the usual hot air, spin and target playing. I'll keep my fingers crossed, though I'm not particularly hopeful.
"All (anyone want to bet that that's not true?) UK households will have a green makeover by 2030 under government plans to reduce carbon emissions and cut energy bills.
Cavity wall and loft insulation will be available for all suitable homes, with plans to retrofit 400,000 homes a year by 2015. Financial incentives for householders will also be available for low-carbon technologies such as solar panels, biomass boilers and ground source heat pumps, paid for by a levy on utility companies."
So is this all new? There seems to me to be little difference from any of the previous initiatives, none of which have proved to be particularly successful. There are a couple of points worth noting though:-Firstly, yet again, these are seen only as targets. Another all process initiative with little productive output other than the favoured box-ticking exercises?
Secondly, if you read it carefully, you will see that the funding is to be provided via a levy on the utility providers, which, as previous attempts at similar initiatives have shown, simply means that, in the end, we pay for it out of our own pockets anyway!
As my Granddad used to say years ago - 'You get nowt for nowt in this life'.
Let's hope that we genuinely get some real 'doing' this time, rather than the usual hot air, spin and target playing. I'll keep my fingers crossed, though I'm not particularly hopeful.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Well, they asked
Tomorrow I head off to ECOpack at the NEC to try to get more support for the RE:tie.
This was timely.
Should packs promote social causes?
So long as the enviROI is positive, it's hard to fault any design for working towards a greater good.
Certainly we at Junkk.com try and advocate reuse at every turn, and facilitate it even if not intended.
But our greatest hope is for second uses that can be built-in, especially if they can be re-evolutionary to existing designs and hence impose little or no capital or material impositions, such as the RE:tie tamper evident security closure for example.
In addition to CSR, PR and marketing opportunities in their own right, such components can surely also provide many of the functions described and discussed above!?
This was timely.
Should packs promote social causes?
So long as the enviROI is positive, it's hard to fault any design for working towards a greater good.
Certainly we at Junkk.com try and advocate reuse at every turn, and facilitate it even if not intended.
But our greatest hope is for second uses that can be built-in, especially if they can be re-evolutionary to existing designs and hence impose little or no capital or material impositions, such as the RE:tie tamper evident security closure for example.
In addition to CSR, PR and marketing opportunities in their own right, such components can surely also provide many of the functions described and discussed above!?
Monday, February 09, 2009
At last, a glimmer
Of hope in common sense, if not much faith in delivery
Quarter of UK homes to be offered a green makeover
In my view, improving home efficiencies to a decent level of enviROI has to be the priority, otherwise any energy generated, no matter how 'greenly', is still being wasted unnecessarily.
Plus there's the small matter of costs, too.
But speaking of money, there is as mentioned that small matter of what is promised vs. what transpires.
Quarter of UK homes to be offered a green makeover
In my view, improving home efficiencies to a decent level of enviROI has to be the priority, otherwise any energy generated, no matter how 'greenly', is still being wasted unnecessarily.
Plus there's the small matter of costs, too.
But speaking of money, there is as mentioned that small matter of what is promised vs. what transpires.
Summit up?
Scientists plan emergency summit on climate change
I am a bit torn on this one.
Fora while I have been banging on that IF it is a serious as is made out then why on earth are the powers that be not making more a an issue of it?
So this looks like a worthy effort to kick-start this.
However, another part of me wonders, post Kyoto, Bali, IPCC, etc, what exactly new they are going to come up with that hasn't worked... obviously... to now, and hence runs the risk of being another high-carbon talk-fest. The word 'summit' gets me right offside immediately, after all the other nonsense events I've been to with the same name.
On past evidence, I honestly don't look forward to how this will get reported, and who these reports will impact and reach. It's the first I have heard of it (didn't look like there was even a website) , and a month is not a long time to prepare, so who is going, why and what are they hoping to achieve?
I am a bit torn on this one.
Fora while I have been banging on that IF it is a serious as is made out then why on earth are the powers that be not making more a an issue of it?
So this looks like a worthy effort to kick-start this.
However, another part of me wonders, post Kyoto, Bali, IPCC, etc, what exactly new they are going to come up with that hasn't worked... obviously... to now, and hence runs the risk of being another high-carbon talk-fest. The word 'summit' gets me right offside immediately, after all the other nonsense events I've been to with the same name.
On past evidence, I honestly don't look forward to how this will get reported, and who these reports will impact and reach. It's the first I have heard of it (didn't look like there was even a website) , and a month is not a long time to prepare, so who is going, why and what are they hoping to achieve?
Sunday, February 08, 2009
IRONY ALERT - speak softly, but carry a big budget
I don't know if I'd go as far as accusing it of greenwashing (they are trying to DO something, well, by 2025), but this banner made me giggle.I don't know if it is complemented by equally large, and expensive print ads, but the TV commercial is certainly pervasive.
So I am a little unclear as to the definition of 'not shouting about it' being used.
And how all that money could be better applied... more tangibly, reducing some more.
Civil unrest
Let engineers make Britain great again
In a quick scan through I think I saw the name 'Dilbert' there; one could do worse than sign up to Mr. Adams' daily bit of genius on the plight of engineers stateside.
I graduated with a Civ. Eng back in the lat 70's, but only on the strict understanding I didn't try and build anything people's lives depended on. Fair enough, and advertising has been mostly kind to me.
Of my graduating class, even back then I doubt more than 10% stayed in the profession for long, and those mostly the guys from the Far East. Almost all my mates ended up as Masters of the Universe in the City; not sure how that is working out now, mind.
I now busy myself with things of a planetary-positive nature, combining my science/engineering education with my media experiences to try and make the world a better place based on a principle I have dubbed the enviROI, basically a measure of how products or initiatives perform in a way that will actually make a positive difference to my kids' futures.
And I have to say that the lack of many... any with even a basic understanding of practical realities in senior government is a worry. And if they do have 'qualified' advisers, these guys don't seem very competent or vocal at setting them straight on what can... and can't work. And that often also includes saving money.
I seem to recall the 'unofficial' motto of either my college (Kings) or the profession was 'An engineer can do for a shilling what any other darn fool can do for a pound'.
Looking at the vast black holes being spun in the the world of green, all I see are targets, box-ticking and lobbyist-fueled agendas that would make any true engineer weep.
We're now in an era of process over product, and being seen to do rather than actually doing anything.
It's a house of cards on near zero foundations. I may not have been the best engineer, but I can see the result a mile off.
And that... really sucks.
In a quick scan through I think I saw the name 'Dilbert' there; one could do worse than sign up to Mr. Adams' daily bit of genius on the plight of engineers stateside.
I graduated with a Civ. Eng back in the lat 70's, but only on the strict understanding I didn't try and build anything people's lives depended on. Fair enough, and advertising has been mostly kind to me.
Of my graduating class, even back then I doubt more than 10% stayed in the profession for long, and those mostly the guys from the Far East. Almost all my mates ended up as Masters of the Universe in the City; not sure how that is working out now, mind.
I now busy myself with things of a planetary-positive nature, combining my science/engineering education with my media experiences to try and make the world a better place based on a principle I have dubbed the enviROI, basically a measure of how products or initiatives perform in a way that will actually make a positive difference to my kids' futures.
And I have to say that the lack of many... any with even a basic understanding of practical realities in senior government is a worry. And if they do have 'qualified' advisers, these guys don't seem very competent or vocal at setting them straight on what can... and can't work. And that often also includes saving money.
I seem to recall the 'unofficial' motto of either my college (Kings) or the profession was 'An engineer can do for a shilling what any other darn fool can do for a pound'.
Looking at the vast black holes being spun in the the world of green, all I see are targets, box-ticking and lobbyist-fueled agendas that would make any true engineer weep.
We're now in an era of process over product, and being seen to do rather than actually doing anything.
It's a house of cards on near zero foundations. I may not have been the best engineer, but I can see the result a mile off.
And that... really sucks.
Thursday, February 05, 2009
CATEGORY - Noise Pollution
Noise Mapping England website -
Don't know if there's one for North of the border or over the water. Maybe they are not noisy?
Don't know if there's one for North of the border or over the water. Maybe they are not noisy?
Shanzai!
The name is reason enough to share.
More Shanzhai madness!
Now the piece itself is not exactly complimentary, but in principle I am on board with (some of)the positive aspects inherent in making stuff out of other stuff.
Also a good opportunity for a punt, not that many others seem to have picked up on it.
More Shanzhai madness!
Now the piece itself is not exactly complimentary, but in principle I am on board with (some of)the positive aspects inherent in making stuff out of other stuff.
Also a good opportunity for a punt, not that many others seem to have picked up on it.
Firefox Surprises
I just upgraded my Firefox browser (Mac only) and a lot of new stuff has popped up.
Oddly (or not, I think they are all Google-linked) this seems to have 'affected' my blog too; I hope in a good way.
A bunch more functionality has appeared.
Now I am all for toys, but having been put off Facebook by all the walls and pokes and what have you I must proceed with caution here.
As building a community is obviously something I am keen to encourage, there is one that strikes a chord immediately, though the name sucks.
It's called 'Followers'. I know this is literally correct, and pretty much says what is on the tin, but I am not sure I like the connotations. Maybe it is just me. Not sure what I would post, but it seems just 'off-putting' in those terms. I guess all who have an interest in my blog and click on a thing to be informed are 'following' it, but for this journey I simply seek to share with 'Fellow Travellers'.
I wonder if Mozilla will be open to the suggestion?
I also need to check out what the other consequences are of adding this, but it may be a worthy option.
Addendum - Let's try. I can 'rename' the title, but it still has those sharing my journey as 'followers' and I can't seem to delete it. Plus there is an option to be 'secret' follower so that allows folk to track without being seen.
Oddly (or not, I think they are all Google-linked) this seems to have 'affected' my blog too; I hope in a good way.
A bunch more functionality has appeared.
Now I am all for toys, but having been put off Facebook by all the walls and pokes and what have you I must proceed with caution here.
As building a community is obviously something I am keen to encourage, there is one that strikes a chord immediately, though the name sucks.
It's called 'Followers'. I know this is literally correct, and pretty much says what is on the tin, but I am not sure I like the connotations. Maybe it is just me. Not sure what I would post, but it seems just 'off-putting' in those terms. I guess all who have an interest in my blog and click on a thing to be informed are 'following' it, but for this journey I simply seek to share with 'Fellow Travellers'.
I wonder if Mozilla will be open to the suggestion?
I also need to check out what the other consequences are of adding this, but it may be a worthy option.
Addendum - Let's try. I can 'rename' the title, but it still has those sharing my journey as 'followers' and I can't seem to delete it. Plus there is an option to be 'secret' follower so that allows folk to track without being seen.
CATEGORY - enviROI
Definition is here
As 'it's not always as clear as you might think', time to start logging instances to demonstrate this.... starting now:
Consumer
Consumer/Industry
Fox News - NEW - The Futility of Hybrid Cars - Now this comes from a certain angle (doesn't everything?), but as this is about enviROI there are legitimate questions if not conclusions.
Industry
packaging news - CPI hits back at Linpac Allibert carbon footprint
As 'it's not always as clear as you might think', time to start logging instances to demonstrate this.... starting now:
Consumer
Consumer/Industry
Fox News - NEW - The Futility of Hybrid Cars - Now this comes from a certain angle (doesn't everything?), but as this is about enviROI there are legitimate questions if not conclusions.
Industry
packaging news - CPI hits back at Linpac Allibert carbon footprint
Sunday, February 01, 2009
CATEGORY - GREEN ROOFS
ARTICLES
Indy - Grass ceiling: How corporate culture is going green
NYT (via Junkk) - NEW - Praise the Lord and Green the Roof
INFORMATION
livingroofs.org -
Indy - Grass ceiling: How corporate culture is going green
NYT (via Junkk) - NEW - Praise the Lord and Green the Roof
INFORMATION
livingroofs.org -
Hey, this could be habit forming
Hey, if it's fun, relevant and somone's kind enough to care and send it in... I'll share:
Praise the Lord and Green the Roof
It actually covers more than green roofs, which is a category already broken out here (and I'll add this to), but is another worthy journey by individuals (in this case a convent) as they try and decide what's best for them... and the enviROI.
Thanks to Junketeer Joseph from, I'm guessing, over the pond. Nice to know this litle blog gets read far and wide.
Praise the Lord and Green the Roof
It actually covers more than green roofs, which is a category already broken out here (and I'll add this to), but is another worthy journey by individuals (in this case a convent) as they try and decide what's best for them... and the enviROI.
Thanks to Junketeer Joseph from, I'm guessing, over the pond. Nice to know this litle blog gets read far and wide.
Friday, January 30, 2009
MAJOR MEDIA E-LINKS
I have done it mentally for so long, but more are springing up daily here's a growing list of where to find stuff out online, and often get to comment upon. When I get time I'll also 'review'.
UK
BBC (B)
iplayer - in theory (!) you can access archive stuff via this. There might be a 7 day window limit on some/most/all
Andrew Marr Show - Has a reply/blog
BBC Green -
cbeebies/ecobeebies -
Green Room - Has a HYS
The Editor's Blog
Newsnight -
Ethical Man - now over. I wonder how much he has stayed with his ethics and how much was just for the duration?
Guardian/Observer (PT)
Ask Leo - Like Prof's Posers, only with answers ready supplied
Climate Change
Climate Change
Conservation
Energy
Environment Weekly - no clue what it is, who is doing or why. Or watching. But here it is. -
Ethical Living
Recycling
Transport
Tread Lightly
What Can I Do?
Independent & Sunday (PT)
Blog
Environment
Ethics Girl
Green Living (inc Green Goddess)
The Environment Channel
Observer (PT)
The Green Gauge
Magazine - has a thing called Ethical that can lead to a Dilemma
Reuters - Environment
SKY
Eden - NEW -
Telegraph (PT)
Earth - leads to more, which I'll look at soon
The Economist
The Times (PT)
Battle of Ideas
Eco-worrier Blog
Environment
Green Central - With Blog
Yahoo -
I've just realised that by trying to compartmentalise I have in fact scattered similar resources across a few category headings. I'll try and bring most under here, including news in the future and others already posted when I get a moment.
One thing seems silly and that's my country separation. This is the net and all things are global. But where necessary I'll break out a place of origin.
Wikipedia - just remember it is not always served by well by those dedicated to objectivity, especially in areas of contention.
Green-err (as in erring on green) Media
ivillage/igo green - US based
responsibility.tv - online
Not a definitive list, so feel free to suggest and I'll add them here.
UK
BBC (B)
iplayer - in theory (!) you can access archive stuff via this. There might be a 7 day window limit on some/most/all
Andrew Marr Show - Has a reply/blog
BBC Green -
cbeebies/ecobeebies -
Green Room - Has a HYS
The Editor's Blog
Newsnight -
Ethical Man - now over. I wonder how much he has stayed with his ethics and how much was just for the duration?
Guardian/Observer (PT)
Ask Leo - Like Prof's Posers, only with answers ready supplied
Climate Change
Climate Change
Conservation
Energy
Environment Weekly - no clue what it is, who is doing or why. Or watching. But here it is. -
Ethical Living
Recycling
Transport
Tread Lightly
What Can I Do?
Independent & Sunday (PT)
Blog
Environment
Ethics Girl
Green Living (inc Green Goddess)
The Environment Channel
Observer (PT)
The Green Gauge
Magazine - has a thing called Ethical that can lead to a Dilemma
Reuters - Environment
SKY
Eden - NEW -
Telegraph (PT)
Earth - leads to more, which I'll look at soon
The Economist
The Times (PT)
Battle of Ideas
Eco-worrier Blog
Environment
Green Central - With Blog
Yahoo -
I've just realised that by trying to compartmentalise I have in fact scattered similar resources across a few category headings. I'll try and bring most under here, including news in the future and others already posted when I get a moment.
One thing seems silly and that's my country separation. This is the net and all things are global. But where necessary I'll break out a place of origin.
Wikipedia - just remember it is not always served by well by those dedicated to objectivity, especially in areas of contention.
Green-err (as in erring on green) Media
ivillage/igo green - US based
responsibility.tv - online
Not a definitive list, so feel free to suggest and I'll add them here.
Put a lid on it. Or... not?
Credit where due...
What should we do about plastic milk bottle tops?
A good post from a useful site on a worthy topic, and the journey to get there. I have replied as there may be a decent dialogue to follow on some issues raised.
Ah, conflicting 'advice' from the authorities. Where we would be without various box-tickers contradicting each other, he asks, rhetorically.
John's final para is bang on, though I fear a vain hope.
I have long since given up trying to get my head around the logic of the stated instructions. The request to collapse surely makes sense to improve the weight:volume ratio lugged by a dirty great truck, but squashing these devils is easier said than done. And having done so, as a matter of physics, without screwing the cap back on I rather suspect they may spring back out.
Thank you for the link to GHS. I have some concerns about logistics, enviROI+ wise, but it's great that there are folk thinking around this. The solution is perhaps in that 500kgs payment threshold.
Now, what if local communities could be coordinated (as you suggest, but on a bigger scale) to drop-off sufficient quantities of any recylate material or reusable item such that it was worth the while of a business to come and get it... and pay. It's possible paying individuals may be a problem, but injecting benefits into the community is still a powerful motivator... and reward.
I have given up on government and LAs, and businesses can be a a tad short-term bottom line (especially at the moment), but am working on it using the postcode location facilities of such as my site, Junkk.com
Thanks also for the associated ideas on reuses. Readers may wish to share any they have on Junkk.com too.
Interestingly, I am still in the thick of promoting my RE:tie re:evolution second use design of the little tamper-evident strap that links the cap to the neck piece (which can be retained on bottle with some closure designs, though not milks) of usually higher end organic milks.
In today's climate, it still amazes me that many high-ups in departments theoretically devoted to reducing unnecessary waste still cannot get their heads round how people might very easily be directed to keep things, reuse things or at least donate in a useful, segregated manner... if well directed, helped and encouraged or, better yet... rewarded.
The time has yet to come. But it will.
What should we do about plastic milk bottle tops?
A good post from a useful site on a worthy topic, and the journey to get there. I have replied as there may be a decent dialogue to follow on some issues raised.
Ah, conflicting 'advice' from the authorities. Where we would be without various box-tickers contradicting each other, he asks, rhetorically.
John's final para is bang on, though I fear a vain hope.
I have long since given up trying to get my head around the logic of the stated instructions. The request to collapse surely makes sense to improve the weight:volume ratio lugged by a dirty great truck, but squashing these devils is easier said than done. And having done so, as a matter of physics, without screwing the cap back on I rather suspect they may spring back out.
Thank you for the link to GHS. I have some concerns about logistics, enviROI+ wise, but it's great that there are folk thinking around this. The solution is perhaps in that 500kgs payment threshold.
Now, what if local communities could be coordinated (as you suggest, but on a bigger scale) to drop-off sufficient quantities of any recylate material or reusable item such that it was worth the while of a business to come and get it... and pay. It's possible paying individuals may be a problem, but injecting benefits into the community is still a powerful motivator... and reward.
I have given up on government and LAs, and businesses can be a a tad short-term bottom line (especially at the moment), but am working on it using the postcode location facilities of such as my site, Junkk.com
Thanks also for the associated ideas on reuses. Readers may wish to share any they have on Junkk.com too.
Interestingly, I am still in the thick of promoting my RE:tie re:evolution second use design of the little tamper-evident strap that links the cap to the neck piece (which can be retained on bottle with some closure designs, though not milks) of usually higher end organic milks.
In today's climate, it still amazes me that many high-ups in departments theoretically devoted to reducing unnecessary waste still cannot get their heads round how people might very easily be directed to keep things, reuse things or at least donate in a useful, segregated manner... if well directed, helped and encouraged or, better yet... rewarded.
The time has yet to come. But it will.
Big issue. Small minds?
Now is the time to think big about man-made climate change
I found this tucked away in the Telegraph today.
That's significant.
Because while I have done, and do most of what I do because of concerns about the possibility of 'our' impact on climate change, albeit in what I consider the more tackleable if possibly minor area (energy consumption and emissions dwarfing all else) of reducing waste, I have noted rather piecemeal, and often contradictory levels of approach and attention paid by 'The Establishment' (Government and media) to date.
If we are about to be toast, the messages we get, and when we get them, and the examples set, don't really... at least to me as one of Joe Public... quite convey the magnitude or urgency that often gets claimed when the topic is 'hot'.
So I have sympathy with Mr. Clover's basic premise. At least the headline and intro.
Not quite so sure on some of the solutions he is advocating.
In fact it is a pity that he gets diverted quickly to these details, when the big one he has raised remains unanswered. Frankly, like too many, and especially those in power, it comes across more as if he is too busy just playing in a lucrative field that he is in, rather than looking more ahead at the main goals.
I think I'll call it, for want of a better word, 'Envirodabbling'. Not sure it's that helpful when pondering the bigger picture.
I found this tucked away in the Telegraph today.
That's significant.
Because while I have done, and do most of what I do because of concerns about the possibility of 'our' impact on climate change, albeit in what I consider the more tackleable if possibly minor area (energy consumption and emissions dwarfing all else) of reducing waste, I have noted rather piecemeal, and often contradictory levels of approach and attention paid by 'The Establishment' (Government and media) to date.
If we are about to be toast, the messages we get, and when we get them, and the examples set, don't really... at least to me as one of Joe Public... quite convey the magnitude or urgency that often gets claimed when the topic is 'hot'.
So I have sympathy with Mr. Clover's basic premise. At least the headline and intro.
Not quite so sure on some of the solutions he is advocating.
In fact it is a pity that he gets diverted quickly to these details, when the big one he has raised remains unanswered. Frankly, like too many, and especially those in power, it comes across more as if he is too busy just playing in a lucrative field that he is in, rather than looking more ahead at the main goals.
I think I'll call it, for want of a better word, 'Envirodabbling'. Not sure it's that helpful when pondering the bigger picture.
Thursday, January 29, 2009
CATEGORY - RE:pair
There is already a 'REPAIR' label at the end, but this is to try and start pulling things together under a category.
Articles
Observer - NEW - Sack the builder, do it yourself
Website
AUTO
breakerlink.com - Ta to Dave of Solarventi for the tip
carsparefinder.co.uk - ditto
Observer - NEW - Don't be a dipstick: Get your spanner out
Repairpal - US-based
CLOTHES
Observer - NEW - Pretty darn good -
HOME
fixya.com -
letsfixit.co.uk - Niiiice
safemanuals.com -
IT
applemacrepair.com
ask rick -
A worthy specific one on PC maintenance: BOOT CAMP 554 – Make Do and Mend, part 6
crucial - Mac upgrade advocacy as greener option. O...k, I'll bite.
e-repair.co.uk - Monitors
fixya.com -
ifixit - OK, it's a tad niche. But I use a Mac and it's in for me!
macfixcentre.com -
safemanuals.com -
ROADS
fixmystreet.com - A little off our patch, but hey, it's repair and nifty, so why not?
Articles
Observer - NEW - Sack the builder, do it yourself
Website
AUTO
breakerlink.com - Ta to Dave of Solarventi for the tip
carsparefinder.co.uk - ditto
Observer - NEW - Don't be a dipstick: Get your spanner out
Repairpal - US-based
CLOTHES
Observer - NEW - Pretty darn good -
HOME
fixya.com -
letsfixit.co.uk - Niiiice
safemanuals.com -
IT
applemacrepair.com
ask rick -
A worthy specific one on PC maintenance: BOOT CAMP 554 – Make Do and Mend, part 6
crucial - Mac upgrade advocacy as greener option. O...k, I'll bite.
e-repair.co.uk - Monitors
fixya.com -
ifixit - OK, it's a tad niche. But I use a Mac and it's in for me!
macfixcentre.com -
safemanuals.com -
ROADS
fixmystreet.com - A little off our patch, but hey, it's repair and nifty, so why not?
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
enviROI anyone?
Stressing this 'a' story about 'a' comment, I share it as it does highlight my preference to being really green as opposed to just ticking boxes.
Which I bang on about enough.
Recycling 'could be adding to global warming'
In passing, I also sense a move towards a related 'eco' issue, namely energy from waste, and wonder if there is some coordination at play.
Whichever way, I simply hope that the enviROI of the 'next big thing' is factored in.
WRAP - WRAP responds to current debate on recycling - 'It is still a better option both financially and environmentally [my highlight] for councils and their council tax payers to recycle rather than send to landfill, even if councils face higher storage charges temporarily.'
Wrap - Recycling continues to be the best option - 'Reports in today’s media suggesting that recycling adds to global warming, rather than tackling it, are misleading and factually incorrect, said WRAP'
Telegraph - Is recycling just an evil ploy?
MRW - Recycling operations could be adding to global warming, says former Biffa director - In posting the ebbs and flows to this story, I am struck by how important 'knowing' is, and yet how little the wiser I still am in all this. Plus the various agendas at play. Some have a vested interest in getting away from recycling, some in slagging it off, and some, conscious of their target-driven bonuses, love collecting the stuff and the heck with whether it makes any sense.
Packaging News - NEW - Waste adviser Peter Jones defends position on recycling - I think I have learned more about the state of our media than the actual issue.
Which I bang on about enough.
Recycling 'could be adding to global warming'
In passing, I also sense a move towards a related 'eco' issue, namely energy from waste, and wonder if there is some coordination at play.
Whichever way, I simply hope that the enviROI of the 'next big thing' is factored in.
WRAP - WRAP responds to current debate on recycling - 'It is still a better option both financially and environmentally [my highlight] for councils and their council tax payers to recycle rather than send to landfill, even if councils face higher storage charges temporarily.'
Wrap - Recycling continues to be the best option - 'Reports in today’s media suggesting that recycling adds to global warming, rather than tackling it, are misleading and factually incorrect, said WRAP'
Telegraph - Is recycling just an evil ploy?
MRW - Recycling operations could be adding to global warming, says former Biffa director - In posting the ebbs and flows to this story, I am struck by how important 'knowing' is, and yet how little the wiser I still am in all this. Plus the various agendas at play. Some have a vested interest in getting away from recycling, some in slagging it off, and some, conscious of their target-driven bonuses, love collecting the stuff and the heck with whether it makes any sense.
Packaging News - NEW - Waste adviser Peter Jones defends position on recycling - I think I have learned more about the state of our media than the actual issue.
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
More doom and gloom
These reports seem to be coming so thick and fast at the moment it is becoming quite easy to, well, simply avoid reading them, but this, from the New Scientist, is short and quite illuminating.
The essence of the piece? Even if we stopped all fossil fuel burning right now, the planet could take over a thousand years to recover from the excess CO2 in the atmosphere.
The essence of the piece? Even if we stopped all fossil fuel burning right now, the planet could take over a thousand years to recover from the excess CO2 in the atmosphere.
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Uh-oh
Now, bear in mind that for the last several years, or family (well, me) has not thrown anything away.
Well, that's not quite true. Between five of us we can still fill a bin liner in a week.
Don't quite know how, as there's an awful lot not in there that I think would be from most households. And of course a fair amount of paper and glass goes off with the RE-Box kerbside collection.
And so the collected bits and bobs that didn't make it are all around the house and grounds in one way or another.
I have this odd notion that I will one day find a use for it all.
However, with the recent flurry of activity from councils on bins, plus the downturn in interest in separated recylates, my wife asked me if we'd end up being lumbered with a stonking bill if we had to get rid of it all.
I assured her not, as those who collect such things appreciate clearly sorted, clean recylables, and other than a few days with a wheelbarrow to the various local skips, we'd be fine.
Or... perhaps not.
Rubbish hoarder ordered to pay £38,000 clean-up bill
Now, my first thought was... 'so this is how you get a feature in the major papers!'
Closely followed by ... 'Uh-oh'.
I was going to also query the cost involved, but now note that most of the sum in question was not for the actual clearing, but to my favourite profession to 'handle' it all.
Not rats here, but ~I might have to review the collection and storage policy soon.
Telegraph - The thin line between junk and treasure -
You have addressed a serious topic with sensitivity.
And I don't wish to hijack what is essentially a piece on mental health and the authorities' reaction to it, but the topic of 'hoarding' has come up and it is one I am both personally and professionally engaged with.
Like your mother, my clutter habit is still within manageable limits. And my marriage still firm, if tested on occasion by my acquisitive tendencies. This is, I suspect, due to the various end of garden composters and cones, a weekly kerbside collection system (soon to be 'improved' away from segregated items back to mixed waste wheelies!), but mostly thanks to a big garden, some sheds, a cellar and a few lofts.
Hence, with a few nasty exceptions, 'we' have thrown nothing away for several years (all washed, dried and stored). This is partly because I am interested in what a family can generate, and seeing scores of the same thing can be eye-opening, but also because I am fascinated by what may be done by way of money-making, planet-saving reuse.
Hence, I use this opportunity to suggest that 'dealing with' some hoarders might be worth redirecting, and for the benefit of the community.
Such as Messrs Cockerham and Stewart are unfortunate extremes, but could there be others - who might be erring on the compulsive - but also offer some value?
Wouldn't it be great to locate such folk and connect them with others?
Yes, most of what I collect is for own use, and I feel the odd tug when even a couple of things are whisked away, but equally I can't use all and space is an issue, so if the local Scouts ask and I can help then handing over a few score cardboard loo rolls or a couple of hundred red bottle caps, it is actually quite rewarding, emotionally for me and, for them, financially.
Hence may I commend sites such as Freecycle and Junkk.com to those who do see value in not throwing all away, as they can offer ways and means to redirect 'waste' into perhaps more productive areas than the bin or landfill. Plus possible valuable social interaction components, too.
Well, that's not quite true. Between five of us we can still fill a bin liner in a week.
Don't quite know how, as there's an awful lot not in there that I think would be from most households. And of course a fair amount of paper and glass goes off with the RE-Box kerbside collection.
And so the collected bits and bobs that didn't make it are all around the house and grounds in one way or another.
I have this odd notion that I will one day find a use for it all.
However, with the recent flurry of activity from councils on bins, plus the downturn in interest in separated recylates, my wife asked me if we'd end up being lumbered with a stonking bill if we had to get rid of it all.
I assured her not, as those who collect such things appreciate clearly sorted, clean recylables, and other than a few days with a wheelbarrow to the various local skips, we'd be fine.
Or... perhaps not.
Rubbish hoarder ordered to pay £38,000 clean-up bill
Now, my first thought was... 'so this is how you get a feature in the major papers!'
Closely followed by ... 'Uh-oh'.
I was going to also query the cost involved, but now note that most of the sum in question was not for the actual clearing, but to my favourite profession to 'handle' it all.
Not rats here, but ~I might have to review the collection and storage policy soon.
Telegraph - The thin line between junk and treasure -
You have addressed a serious topic with sensitivity.
And I don't wish to hijack what is essentially a piece on mental health and the authorities' reaction to it, but the topic of 'hoarding' has come up and it is one I am both personally and professionally engaged with.
Like your mother, my clutter habit is still within manageable limits. And my marriage still firm, if tested on occasion by my acquisitive tendencies. This is, I suspect, due to the various end of garden composters and cones, a weekly kerbside collection system (soon to be 'improved' away from segregated items back to mixed waste wheelies!), but mostly thanks to a big garden, some sheds, a cellar and a few lofts.
Hence, with a few nasty exceptions, 'we' have thrown nothing away for several years (all washed, dried and stored). This is partly because I am interested in what a family can generate, and seeing scores of the same thing can be eye-opening, but also because I am fascinated by what may be done by way of money-making, planet-saving reuse.
Hence, I use this opportunity to suggest that 'dealing with' some hoarders might be worth redirecting, and for the benefit of the community.
Such as Messrs Cockerham and Stewart are unfortunate extremes, but could there be others - who might be erring on the compulsive - but also offer some value?
Wouldn't it be great to locate such folk and connect them with others?
Yes, most of what I collect is for own use, and I feel the odd tug when even a couple of things are whisked away, but equally I can't use all and space is an issue, so if the local Scouts ask and I can help then handing over a few score cardboard loo rolls or a couple of hundred red bottle caps, it is actually quite rewarding, emotionally for me and, for them, financially.
Hence may I commend sites such as Freecycle and Junkk.com to those who do see value in not throwing all away, as they can offer ways and means to redirect 'waste' into perhaps more productive areas than the bin or landfill. Plus possible valuable social interaction components, too.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Try googling 'Oops'
In so many mirror gazing ways it's hard to know where to start.
By not sharing this, for one, probably:(
Revealed: the environmental impact of Google searches
Kind of puts' do no harm' under the spotlight.
Frankly I figure we need to get back to priorities, and with luck this may make those a tad to quick to invoke a ban or point a finger look a bit closer to home before they get all selective of what 'they' want 'others' to not do.
I don't see googling being off most folks menus any time soon.
I wonder if there's any irony now in using the Google Carbon Calculator?
Indy - Giant plasma TVs face ban in battle to green Britain
Interesting, as I read this on my PC.
I must google further...
Oh, rats.
BBC - 'Carbon cost' of Google revealed
The Register - Forget Google rationing: Only lighting farts can save the planet
Addendum...
Guardian - Sunday Times clarifies figures in Google carbon emissions debate - The MSM. What's not to like? Or trust. Or respect? Or pay attention to...
By not sharing this, for one, probably:(
Revealed: the environmental impact of Google searches
Kind of puts' do no harm' under the spotlight.
Frankly I figure we need to get back to priorities, and with luck this may make those a tad to quick to invoke a ban or point a finger look a bit closer to home before they get all selective of what 'they' want 'others' to not do.
I don't see googling being off most folks menus any time soon.
I wonder if there's any irony now in using the Google Carbon Calculator?
Indy - Giant plasma TVs face ban in battle to green Britain
Interesting, as I read this on my PC.
I must google further...
Oh, rats.
BBC - 'Carbon cost' of Google revealed
The Register - Forget Google rationing: Only lighting farts can save the planet
Addendum...
Guardian - Sunday Times clarifies figures in Google carbon emissions debate - The MSM. What's not to like? Or trust. Or respect? Or pay attention to...
One wonders how they'd organise a party in a brewery
It's not often I am on the side of authorities.
Bin taxes rejected by councils
Oh heck, why change now? Not impressed.
I merely mourn, in passing, aspects that did appeal, such as this.. 'Under the plans local authorities were being offered the chance to give rebates to households producing the least waste', that were lost thanks, IMHO, to the other punitive (especially fine revenue generating) ideas floated, and the way they were shared.
Telegraph - NEW - Bin taxes: councils, for once, seemed to listen
Bin taxes rejected by councils
Oh heck, why change now? Not impressed.
I merely mourn, in passing, aspects that did appeal, such as this.. 'Under the plans local authorities were being offered the chance to give rebates to households producing the least waste', that were lost thanks, IMHO, to the other punitive (especially fine revenue generating) ideas floated, and the way they were shared.
Telegraph - NEW - Bin taxes: councils, for once, seemed to listen
We do science, we do
As an ex-scientist/engineer I have a firm belief in the value of this country's support of same.
Hence I was attracted to this article in the Newsnight blog:
Restoring science to its rightful place
Sadly, as the comments in reply (the first is a doozy, especially the end piece. I speak as one trying to forge a commercial model new media entity dealing in the environment, and one day found myself competing with BBC Green) would suggest, it has been found rather wanting.
Science deals in fact, as does... should... reporting. It is hard not to feel this piece was more opinion dressed up. And I do wonder how appropriate it is for a 'reporter' for the BBC to be quite so definitive in her critiques on an outgoing administration when much is still unknown. The optimism for an agent of 'change', whatever that is, is perhaps understandable given the degree of uncritical analysis of the new President's plans to date, but surely should be couched in terms, dare I say science-based ones, that accept it's hard to predict based on what we don't yet know.
Shame the vast majority subjected to the broadcast are unlikely to be exposed to such worthy and relevant debate to appreciate the critical underpinnings of 'science', and not the fluffy, agenda-driven versions too often trotted out by our national broadcaster and its often less than qualified, or if so (Ms. Watts' resume is a lot more relevant than most), barely competent and/or objective cabal of 'analysts'.
I happen to think there is much worth considering seriously in the environmental arena, but as a fact-based environmentalist shudder at each grotesque, rushed-out bit of spin from the BBC that seems designed to push an 'ideal' (at least in their eyes), but when found wanting simply sets back the worthy, public-influencing, patient, test and confirm methodologies that can lead to genuine insights we can act on with confidence.
Harmless Sky - BBC Newsnight - Warming up President Obama’s inaugural speech? - Hmnn
The Newsnight editor has now responded:
Hello All,
Re the opening of Susan's piece. We did edit sections of the speech to reflect the elements in it that referred to Science. The aim was to give people an impression or montage of what Obama said about science in his inauguration speech. This was signposted to audiences with fades between each point. It in no way altered the meaning or misrepresented what the
President was saying. You can look for yourself above.
Apologies for not responding sooner. I thought I had. BBC Editors find this blogging software frustrating at times too.
Peter Rippon
Editor, Newsnight
I am afraid I found his reply wanting:
Hello back. Thank you for at last replying, on behalf of Ms. Watts and all involved in this. And the apology... if only for the delay in reply. I can see how, being the editor of a news programme caught in a sticky situation brought to one's attention in places, such as your own blog, one could forget doing so before now. I wonder what aspect of the blogging software let you down? It seems to have been working fine for quite a while now (or was your first effort 'moderated', which I agree can be 'frustrating'?).
It's a pity how often a BBC reply can often seem more like bringing in some Kimberly diamond miners when it comes to digging a deeper hole.
I don't propose to address the 'techniques' and what they were intended to facilitate, as others have clearly explained how well it went down. Nor do I intend to get into any discussion of climate, 'optimist' or 'pessimist', save to say as one environmentally concerned erring on caution, 'helping the cause along' by rigging things makes me groan as it makes my efforts at factual persuasion all the harder.
However, I do now unfortunately have yet more words and phrases to add to along, growing and rather ignoble list of 'journalistic'/reportage'/'editorial' doublespeak being used in weak post justification, that does the cause of conveying objective news little credit.
So to such as 'interpreting events' I can now, sadly, add...
'... reflect the elements...'
'... give people an impression or montage of what [was] said... about [topic]..]
' This was signposted...'
The first two seem barely more than excuses for changing things to suit. The third simply a weasel for very stealthily enabling/excusing very stealthy editing.
Sorry, not convinced, and it would seem I am not alone. Nil points.
Gaurdian - Newsnight in fakery row over Obama report - The quantity, and quality of the replies show a worrying inisght into the midsets at play.
Telegraph - BBC accused of fakery over Barack Obama inauguration speech
Telegraph - Obama can afford to lay off press officers now the BBC is working for him free of charge
Hence I was attracted to this article in the Newsnight blog:
Restoring science to its rightful place
Sadly, as the comments in reply (the first is a doozy, especially the end piece. I speak as one trying to forge a commercial model new media entity dealing in the environment, and one day found myself competing with BBC Green) would suggest, it has been found rather wanting.
Science deals in fact, as does... should... reporting. It is hard not to feel this piece was more opinion dressed up. And I do wonder how appropriate it is for a 'reporter' for the BBC to be quite so definitive in her critiques on an outgoing administration when much is still unknown. The optimism for an agent of 'change', whatever that is, is perhaps understandable given the degree of uncritical analysis of the new President's plans to date, but surely should be couched in terms, dare I say science-based ones, that accept it's hard to predict based on what we don't yet know.
Shame the vast majority subjected to the broadcast are unlikely to be exposed to such worthy and relevant debate to appreciate the critical underpinnings of 'science', and not the fluffy, agenda-driven versions too often trotted out by our national broadcaster and its often less than qualified, or if so (Ms. Watts' resume is a lot more relevant than most), barely competent and/or objective cabal of 'analysts'.
I happen to think there is much worth considering seriously in the environmental arena, but as a fact-based environmentalist shudder at each grotesque, rushed-out bit of spin from the BBC that seems designed to push an 'ideal' (at least in their eyes), but when found wanting simply sets back the worthy, public-influencing, patient, test and confirm methodologies that can lead to genuine insights we can act on with confidence.
Harmless Sky - BBC Newsnight - Warming up President Obama’s inaugural speech? - Hmnn
The Newsnight editor has now responded:
Hello All,
Re the opening of Susan's piece. We did edit sections of the speech to reflect the elements in it that referred to Science. The aim was to give people an impression or montage of what Obama said about science in his inauguration speech. This was signposted to audiences with fades between each point. It in no way altered the meaning or misrepresented what the
President was saying. You can look for yourself above.
Apologies for not responding sooner. I thought I had. BBC Editors find this blogging software frustrating at times too.
Peter Rippon
Editor, Newsnight
I am afraid I found his reply wanting:
Hello back. Thank you for at last replying, on behalf of Ms. Watts and all involved in this. And the apology... if only for the delay in reply. I can see how, being the editor of a news programme caught in a sticky situation brought to one's attention in places, such as your own blog, one could forget doing so before now. I wonder what aspect of the blogging software let you down? It seems to have been working fine for quite a while now (or was your first effort 'moderated', which I agree can be 'frustrating'?).
It's a pity how often a BBC reply can often seem more like bringing in some Kimberly diamond miners when it comes to digging a deeper hole.
I don't propose to address the 'techniques' and what they were intended to facilitate, as others have clearly explained how well it went down. Nor do I intend to get into any discussion of climate, 'optimist' or 'pessimist', save to say as one environmentally concerned erring on caution, 'helping the cause along' by rigging things makes me groan as it makes my efforts at factual persuasion all the harder.
However, I do now unfortunately have yet more words and phrases to add to along, growing and rather ignoble list of 'journalistic'/reportage'/'editorial' doublespeak being used in weak post justification, that does the cause of conveying objective news little credit.
So to such as 'interpreting events' I can now, sadly, add...
'... reflect the elements...'
'... give people an impression or montage of what [was] said... about [topic]..]
' This was signposted...'
The first two seem barely more than excuses for changing things to suit. The third simply a weasel for very stealthily enabling/excusing very stealthy editing.
Sorry, not convinced, and it would seem I am not alone. Nil points.
Gaurdian - Newsnight in fakery row over Obama report - The quantity, and quality of the replies show a worrying inisght into the midsets at play.
Telegraph - BBC accused of fakery over Barack Obama inauguration speech
Telegraph - Obama can afford to lay off press officers now the BBC is working for him free of charge
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
A campaign to get behind (and then close)
I very much doubt I was the first to think of it. Or highlight it. But I was... am at least ahead of the Guardian: Open door policy
Anyway, as they have more readers (for now), I'll just say it's a good idea for a campaign. And one that is less ban and more save. So it's hard to see a downside.
Guardian - Shut that door!
Telegraph - NEW - Close the door and save energy - Another door opens?
Anyway, as they have more readers (for now), I'll just say it's a good idea for a campaign. And one that is less ban and more save. So it's hard to see a downside.
Guardian - Shut that door!
Telegraph - NEW - Close the door and save energy - Another door opens?
Monday, January 19, 2009
Tony Hart, RIP
TV presenter Tony Hart dies
I don't think that headline does him, and the influence he had, justice.
He was a 'doer', not just a talker, and though very restrained in style, a more eloquent communicator and, as a consequence, inspiration to many than the current crop of talking heads we have today.
He was ahead of his time, AND I am still in envy of his getting a bunch of us to see the value of making things, and better yet making them often out of junk.
I consider him one of the influences that lead me to create Junkk.
http://www.tonyhart.co.uk/gallery/tony_hart_gallery_2005.htm
I don't think that headline does him, and the influence he had, justice.
He was a 'doer', not just a talker, and though very restrained in style, a more eloquent communicator and, as a consequence, inspiration to many than the current crop of talking heads we have today.
He was ahead of his time, AND I am still in envy of his getting a bunch of us to see the value of making things, and better yet making them often out of junk.
I consider him one of the influences that lead me to create Junkk.
http://www.tonyhart.co.uk/gallery/tony_hart_gallery_2005.htm
Sunday, January 18, 2009
The age of oil is ending
When I saw that headline, I thought this article from the Vancouver Sun was going to be another of those sensational headline, eco-warrior, crazy rants ('we're all doomed') about the end of the world being nigh; but this is a largely considered and well structured comment, and is full of factual information, on the subject of Peak Oil.
The strange thing is, even though it is not written as a 'rant' story, it still leaves you feeling, well, rather concerned and worried about the future.
Hmmm .... perhaps time to clean up and re-grease my old bicycle?
President 'has four years to save Earth' - now that's what you call a 'sensational' headline. And from The Observer, no less.
I wonder if Obama will ask for Ol' Golden's help in saving the world?
The strange thing is, even though it is not written as a 'rant' story, it still leaves you feeling, well, rather concerned and worried about the future.
Hmmm .... perhaps time to clean up and re-grease my old bicycle?
President 'has four years to save Earth' - now that's what you call a 'sensational' headline. And from The Observer, no less.
I wonder if Obama will ask for Ol' Golden's help in saving the world?
Friday, January 16, 2009
Box tickers rule?
The Daily Mail has a bit if a reputation for the.. 'sensational'.
However, I believe that most are able to separate the wheat from the chaff and, at the end of the day, a fact is a fact.
Woman, 91, dies 'after becoming stressed over £16,000 council bill to make her home eco-friendly'
No one seems to be disputing what happened. Indeed why seems pretty clear.
How is another matter.
Presuming the reporting to be accurate, this story, and quote, suggests that we are in an era embodied by such as the notorious Baby P cases' Sharon Shoesmith, who has a fellow mindset that is hard to swallow:
Councillor Zita Wiltshire, the local housing chief, said leaseholders were consulted on charges in 2006 and made aware of how much they would have to pay.
Cllr Wiltshire said: 'We are sympathetic to the concerns of our leaseholders but the council does spell out the detail of the financial obligations imposed upon a lessee in the terms of each right-to-buy lease.'
I presume her index-linked will easily cover all such demands on her once in retirement.
This is not the way to save the planet, or indeed sell the wisdom of all necessary measures to help do so.
However, I believe that most are able to separate the wheat from the chaff and, at the end of the day, a fact is a fact.
Woman, 91, dies 'after becoming stressed over £16,000 council bill to make her home eco-friendly'
No one seems to be disputing what happened. Indeed why seems pretty clear.
How is another matter.
Presuming the reporting to be accurate, this story, and quote, suggests that we are in an era embodied by such as the notorious Baby P cases' Sharon Shoesmith, who has a fellow mindset that is hard to swallow:
Councillor Zita Wiltshire, the local housing chief, said leaseholders were consulted on charges in 2006 and made aware of how much they would have to pay.
Cllr Wiltshire said: 'We are sympathetic to the concerns of our leaseholders but the council does spell out the detail of the financial obligations imposed upon a lessee in the terms of each right-to-buy lease.'
I presume her index-linked will easily cover all such demands on her once in retirement.
This is not the way to save the planet, or indeed sell the wisdom of all necessary measures to help do so.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
DDAIDDAIS
That's one of Peter's favourite acronyms - 'don't do as I do, do as I say'.
And it is highly applicable here as this from BusinessGreen.com highlights what appears to be yet another rather large ooooops! from our Gov.
The building that houses the Committee on Climate Change and the Department of Energy and Climate Control (hmmmm, I wasn't even aware we had a department for climate control?) has been graded with 'with the lowest possible energy score, which was described as "one of the worst ratings yet recorded"'
"For years, ministers have promised to ensure that all buildings under central government control are within the top quartile of energy performance. At present, qualifying could mean getting as low a rating as a C. Yet the building that houses the Committee on Climate Change has one of the very worst of the G ratings so far recorded."
And it gets worse - 15 Gov. departments are actually less energy efficient now than they were in 2000!
Twas ever thus.
And it is highly applicable here as this from BusinessGreen.com highlights what appears to be yet another rather large ooooops! from our Gov.
The building that houses the Committee on Climate Change and the Department of Energy and Climate Control (hmmmm, I wasn't even aware we had a department for climate control?) has been graded with 'with the lowest possible energy score, which was described as "one of the worst ratings yet recorded"'
"For years, ministers have promised to ensure that all buildings under central government control are within the top quartile of energy performance. At present, qualifying could mean getting as low a rating as a C. Yet the building that houses the Committee on Climate Change has one of the very worst of the G ratings so far recorded."
And it gets worse - 15 Gov. departments are actually less energy efficient now than they were in 2000!
Twas ever thus.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Sometimes you just have to sit back and appreciate the show
This is indeed a class war, and the campaign against the Aga starts here
Actually, some pretty good points being made, but I rather suspect this may get all rather lost as some whipping up a lasagne en route to the next protest won't see it that way.
And, as I now notice the sidebar, it just has to get more... 'interesting'....
This is something worse than class war
One I think I will observe, discretely from a distance. Whilst many Fiesta-driving, tabloid-buying MoPs (Members of the Public Striving) might well know nothing about the battle raging aroun.. above them.
Actually, some pretty good points being made, but I rather suspect this may get all rather lost as some whipping up a lasagne en route to the next protest won't see it that way.
And, as I now notice the sidebar, it just has to get more... 'interesting'....
This is something worse than class war
One I think I will observe, discretely from a distance. Whilst many Fiesta-driving, tabloid-buying MoPs (Members of the Public Striving) might well know nothing about the battle raging aroun.. above them.
First Self Trumpet Blow of the New Year (sorry)
I know green blogs are a bit of a bore when they talk about themselves all the time.But I like to think we're pretty well balanced, and when something complimentary happens it does make you proud and feel like sharing.
This was a welcome surprise, and spin-off from our little Voucher Tree initiative from late last year, which did pretty well locally.
Well, it has spun off and gone a bit further, which is nice, all thanks to my Vac:Sac catching the eye of the Hereford Journal photographer.
It was also worth noting that in chatting with the reporter when she was researching the story, the link we now have with Poundland piqued her interest mote than a little, and cropped up more than once in the piece.
I think a New Resolution might be to get back in touch and a) do something jointly to help their customers 'green up' even more with Junkk.com, and b) PR the heck out of it!
Buy pass
Of all the activist groups, I have found Greenpeace to be the most erratic to follow and/or support consistently.
Protest is very much the bedrock of a free society, and they have dealt in this for decades, pretty much always effectively but not, IMHO, always wisely.
As a rule of thumb, I am not in favour of anything that creates risk, breaks laws, incites violence or, and especially, efforts that selectively target and inconvenience poor schmoes just trying to get on with their lives.
With this latter at least, I usually wonder how the perpetrators would feel if their chance and a holiday or somesuch was ruined by a bunch of others who are often a tad selective about what they do and what they aim to stop.
However, smart ways of raising profile that hit the pockets evenly by being more targeted at corporates and governments (it all ends up back in our wallets no matter what, let's not forget) are, when done well, to be admired.
Hence I think the purchase of a parcel of land in the way of the proposed 3rd runway, to be divided into mini-plots, to be very smart.
Not quite so sure on some of the justifications being used (the spokesperson was very inarticulate and hence less than persuasive in soliciting public support on SKY news just now), and again the choice of celebrity messengers (a few of the luvvies being against this seem quite well travelled, and indeed seem more concerned with what was going on over their West London homes than sea levels in the Maldives), but this is one worth following to see how the various protagonists handle it all (I see Mr. Brown in a dithering funk, the business community tying itself in contradictory 'good for the community' knots and the activists getting more radical and losing public sympathy pretty quickly... all per usual).
BBC - Protesters buy up Heathrow land
Protest is very much the bedrock of a free society, and they have dealt in this for decades, pretty much always effectively but not, IMHO, always wisely.
As a rule of thumb, I am not in favour of anything that creates risk, breaks laws, incites violence or, and especially, efforts that selectively target and inconvenience poor schmoes just trying to get on with their lives.
With this latter at least, I usually wonder how the perpetrators would feel if their chance and a holiday or somesuch was ruined by a bunch of others who are often a tad selective about what they do and what they aim to stop.
However, smart ways of raising profile that hit the pockets evenly by being more targeted at corporates and governments (it all ends up back in our wallets no matter what, let's not forget) are, when done well, to be admired.
Hence I think the purchase of a parcel of land in the way of the proposed 3rd runway, to be divided into mini-plots, to be very smart.
Not quite so sure on some of the justifications being used (the spokesperson was very inarticulate and hence less than persuasive in soliciting public support on SKY news just now), and again the choice of celebrity messengers (a few of the luvvies being against this seem quite well travelled, and indeed seem more concerned with what was going on over their West London homes than sea levels in the Maldives), but this is one worth following to see how the various protagonists handle it all (I see Mr. Brown in a dithering funk, the business community tying itself in contradictory 'good for the community' knots and the activists getting more radical and losing public sympathy pretty quickly... all per usual).
BBC - Protesters buy up Heathrow land
Irony Alert - A picture is worth a 1,000 words
Peter in Greenland
A silent prayer from the media scrum covered the religious group paying for climate action.
Check the picture captioned 'At the end of the trip, Peter flies home...'
I can't believe it wasn't staged. Very subtle if so. Or maybe he just got on the, er, plane first or off last.
A silent prayer from the media scrum covered the religious group paying for climate action.
Check the picture captioned 'At the end of the trip, Peter flies home...'
I can't believe it wasn't staged. Very subtle if so. Or maybe he just got on the, er, plane first or off last.
Sunday, January 11, 2009
It has emerged...
This is less about wind power than media reporting, though it is obviously the topic featured too...
A small complaint
I am still prepared to be convinced on the enviROI of the whole national endeavour, but when I don't trust government and can't reply on the MSM, I have to say that when the latter get nailed like this my scepticism level has to creep up a notch higher.
A small complaint
I am still prepared to be convinced on the enviROI of the whole national endeavour, but when I don't trust government and can't reply on the MSM, I have to say that when the latter get nailed like this my scepticism level has to creep up a notch higher.
Not exactly the best start to the year
Why waste authorities are a lot of rubbish
Sadly, the commenters so far are a wee bit more concerned about the misuse of mobiles, than our seeing yet more decision-making, and accountability, hived off to yet another quango.
Is this really what is taking place?
No point asking my MP as he's out to lunch having decided a year ago to quit next election, which has resulted in 'interesting' representation.
Sadly, the commenters so far are a wee bit more concerned about the misuse of mobiles, than our seeing yet more decision-making, and accountability, hived off to yet another quango.
Is this really what is taking place?
No point asking my MP as he's out to lunch having decided a year ago to quit next election, which has resulted in 'interesting' representation.
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Fly me to the moon
I think it's one venue as yet unexplored.
UN Climate Conference: The countdown to Copenhagen
I'm sorry, I got as far as '15,000 officials from 200 countries (officials, advisers, diplomats, campaigners and media personnel)' to start losing faith.
When I saw the rallying cry is back to 'global warming' I pretty much gave up.
UN Climate Conference: The countdown to Copenhagen
I'm sorry, I got as far as '15,000 officials from 200 countries (officials, advisers, diplomats, campaigners and media personnel)' to start losing faith.
When I saw the rallying cry is back to 'global warming' I pretty much gave up.
Friday, January 09, 2009
Value judgements
Regular readers know I often bang on about enviROI of projects.
Well, now there's another one in the mix:
Chance for social enterprise to be more enterprising
I wish them well.
But I can see it being a lot trickier than enviROI which, despite allowing for the option of a person to be content with losing money for an environmental benefit, still is pretty grounded in numbers plus and minus.
I don't envy trying to put a figure that means much on many possibly socially beneficial projects.
Well, now there's another one in the mix:
Chance for social enterprise to be more enterprising
I wish them well.
But I can see it being a lot trickier than enviROI which, despite allowing for the option of a person to be content with losing money for an environmental benefit, still is pretty grounded in numbers plus and minus.
I don't envy trying to put a figure that means much on many possibly socially beneficial projects.
Beating the crunch
Sadly, not the credit crunch this time:(However, in the spirit of 'it's good to share', and my last car-borne outing had a relatively happy outcome (our re-engined Golf doing sterling work as we speak... long may it continue to do so), let's try again.
Monday was, according to the Daily Telegraph, 'the most stressful day of the year.' Well, yes, I could get around to accepting that.
For this was the day my tropics-trained missus met black ice for the first time, and that's one postbox that won't be taking mail for a wee while.
Now it was an incredibly slow impact, as even the airbags didn't go off.
And, though it really... really looks worse in the picture, after a quick gander my hopes were raised.
Sure, all the crumple zones had done what they were meant to, but as far as I could gather, beyond the front, bonnet and a few important bits of engine that bore the brunt, it was all in one piece. And nothing major bent any further back.
Sadly, this seems not enough to be worth saving to the counters of beans at my insurers. I guess the cost of mending came in above the cost of slipping us the road value and, well, money talks.
So again I am presented with a series of dilemmas that span the whole gamut from enviro to eco.. nomic.
Take the money and get a replacement? If so, maybe an existing LPG? Or try and 'save' it. I am not sure what one can do, but assuming they give me the write-off value I can still 'buy' it from them and then try and fix it. But... is it worth it?
Another journey is embraked upon which I'll share....
UPDATE
The plot thick... well, goes further downhill.
It really is not worth trying to save. It can be fixed, but to do so would take something like £5k, and that's to end up with a car 'worth' £1300 (according to the nice man from Norwich Union - I then had to spend all day yesterday 'proving' it was worth more, and ended up in some bizarre Marrakesh-market haggle. Not what I expected from a top insurer).
I am now on the trail of some dual/bifuels, and they do seem to be like hen's teeth. Especially at the budget I have set. A further 'complication' is that having chatted with a few garages they seem to think getting a factory-fitted option is much safer to a retro-fitted kit version, and that reduces things a lot more. So far all I am seeing is a few Volvos.
The hunt continues....
Thursday, January 08, 2009
ET, recycle that phone...
Wind turbine destroyed after 'octopus UFO' seen in sky
Interesting possible explanation from the media to this incident.
I wonder if advanced cultures have no knowledge of wind turbines; hence the unfamiliarity leading to the impact (though after a few billion miles dodgy asteroids I'd have thought a turbine blade might be easily dodged).
Maybe they looked at the enviROI? Not sure being unable to cope with ice is too encouraging, what with the climate change we're experiencing.
I wonder if the actual reason will be shared? If it is mundane I doubt it.
Gaurdian - UFOs crashing into wind farms: has the Guardian solved the mystery? - QED
Telegraph - 'UFO' turbine debris sent to German forensic scientists
Times - We just can’t get enough of those little green men - best explataion yet as 1st comment to this
Interesting possible explanation from the media to this incident.
I wonder if advanced cultures have no knowledge of wind turbines; hence the unfamiliarity leading to the impact (though after a few billion miles dodgy asteroids I'd have thought a turbine blade might be easily dodged).
Maybe they looked at the enviROI? Not sure being unable to cope with ice is too encouraging, what with the climate change we're experiencing.
I wonder if the actual reason will be shared? If it is mundane I doubt it.
Gaurdian - UFOs crashing into wind farms: has the Guardian solved the mystery? - QED
Telegraph - 'UFO' turbine debris sent to German forensic scientists
Times - We just can’t get enough of those little green men - best explataion yet as 1st comment to this
Monday, January 05, 2009
One can but hope...
Will We Be Green in 2009?
Some interesting, and encouraging (I was about to shut up shop) signs for genuine green initiatives as far as the consumer is concerned.
Quite a lot bears out what we've been banging on about anyway.
Or... we could end up with a multimillion £ recycling campaign when they have nowhere to put what they've got already, and a bunch more 'our CEO drives a 7litre hydrogen-powered limo', like that has any end-benefit value or relevance to the poor consumer trudging the aisles.
What do you reckon?
There is a free report available.
Some interesting, and encouraging (I was about to shut up shop) signs for genuine green initiatives as far as the consumer is concerned.
Quite a lot bears out what we've been banging on about anyway.
Or... we could end up with a multimillion £ recycling campaign when they have nowhere to put what they've got already, and a bunch more 'our CEO drives a 7litre hydrogen-powered limo', like that has any end-benefit value or relevance to the poor consumer trudging the aisles.
What do you reckon?
There is a free report available.
Sunday, January 04, 2009
enviROI is even more important now
Catching up on the last few weeks' papers' 'green' pages has not been fun.
Not just because the news is pretty dire, but more because of many authorities reactions to it.
There are too many to post here, but just as an example of situation and reaction...
Telegraph - First glimpse of rubbish mountains caused by recycling industry slump
Daily Mail - Recycling crisis: Taxpayers foot the bill for UK's growing waste paper mountain as market collapses
Telegraph - Waste Watch: waste, litter and wind turbines
Reduction and reuse anyone?
Not just because the news is pretty dire, but more because of many authorities reactions to it.
There are too many to post here, but just as an example of situation and reaction...
Telegraph - First glimpse of rubbish mountains caused by recycling industry slump
Daily Mail - Recycling crisis: Taxpayers foot the bill for UK's growing waste paper mountain as market collapses
Telegraph - Waste Watch: waste, litter and wind turbines
Reduction and reuse anyone?
Saturday, January 03, 2009
Numbers games
I am guided in the value of much that is 'green' by enviROI.
Whilst based on a rather less than thrilling hypothetical (I hope) concept, I found this, and the comments provoked... interesting:
The carbon footprint of nuclear war
Whilst based on a rather less than thrilling hypothetical (I hope) concept, I found this, and the comments provoked... interesting:
The carbon footprint of nuclear war
Friday, January 02, 2009
First Irony Alert of the Year
And, bless, it goes to.... The Guardian...
Tell Obama what his inauguration means to you and win a ticket to the proceedings
Winners will be given airfare...
Tell Obama what his inauguration means to you and win a ticket to the proceedings
Winners will be given airfare...
New Year recycling
While I was away I noticed something that I couldn't resist commenting on...
Next year on Newsnight ... possibly the return of Ethical Man.
If you are doing another 'Ethical Man', while I appreciate all the useful information that was/is/will be shared to help make informed environmental commitments, it would be useful if the options laid out are balanced and have the full enviROI consequences, pro and con, laid out. Try finding a reporter qualified to report and challenge the issues, and able to appreciate the irony of standing on ice floes to which they have flown, to decry the consequences of the rest of 'us' flying.
So.. no more 'analysts', please.
Plus, as purely personal opinion, when it comes to the gimmick, I do rather question the eventual message sent out that whatever a family does commit to can be picked up and then dropped once the show run is over. That rather errs on 'do as we say, and did for a wee while because it ticks a box'. A planet is for life, not just a special segment.
I think the facts, and objective consequences, being laid out will suffice.
And if a Newsnight twofer is still deemed necessary, might one hope for more moderate (or at least a change from the usual researcher's speed-dial suspects) debaters be invited to discuss any disputed issues?
A Plane Stupid or Greenpeace spokesperson vs. a big oil or airline lobbyist frankly leaves the likes of me stuck in a no man's land as the two extremes trade global warming absolutes at each other.
You can't appreciate the subtle hues of green if they are only presented in black or white. Much like most other topics.
Serve the interests of the public (those who can only afford small hatchbacks rather than Priuses), not market rate pay grades driven by ratings.
Next year on Newsnight ... possibly the return of Ethical Man.
If you are doing another 'Ethical Man', while I appreciate all the useful information that was/is/will be shared to help make informed environmental commitments, it would be useful if the options laid out are balanced and have the full enviROI consequences, pro and con, laid out. Try finding a reporter qualified to report and challenge the issues, and able to appreciate the irony of standing on ice floes to which they have flown, to decry the consequences of the rest of 'us' flying.
So.. no more 'analysts', please.
Plus, as purely personal opinion, when it comes to the gimmick, I do rather question the eventual message sent out that whatever a family does commit to can be picked up and then dropped once the show run is over. That rather errs on 'do as we say, and did for a wee while because it ticks a box'. A planet is for life, not just a special segment.
I think the facts, and objective consequences, being laid out will suffice.
And if a Newsnight twofer is still deemed necessary, might one hope for more moderate (or at least a change from the usual researcher's speed-dial suspects) debaters be invited to discuss any disputed issues?
A Plane Stupid or Greenpeace spokesperson vs. a big oil or airline lobbyist frankly leaves the likes of me stuck in a no man's land as the two extremes trade global warming absolutes at each other.
You can't appreciate the subtle hues of green if they are only presented in black or white. Much like most other topics.
Serve the interests of the public (those who can only afford small hatchbacks rather than Priuses), not market rate pay grades driven by ratings.
Carbon Negative Cement?
Sound a bit far fetched?
Given that cement, the backbone of almost all of mankind's basic building blocks, accounts for some 5% of global CO2 emissions (that's more than the entire aviation industry), any breakthrough in reducing the cement industry's emissions ought to be very welcome.
Well, step forward a new cement from Novacem that not only reduces CO2 emissions during production, it also absorbs CO2 as it hardens, arguably making it carbon negative. Full story from Aggregate Research.
"Novacems cement, based on magnesium silicates, not only requires much less heating, it also absorbs large amounts of CO2 as it hardens, making it carbon negative. "
It will be very interesting to see just what the EnviROI of this new product might be, but it sounds to me like it could be a BIG winner, not just for Novacem, but also for the environment.
Given that cement, the backbone of almost all of mankind's basic building blocks, accounts for some 5% of global CO2 emissions (that's more than the entire aviation industry), any breakthrough in reducing the cement industry's emissions ought to be very welcome.
Well, step forward a new cement from Novacem that not only reduces CO2 emissions during production, it also absorbs CO2 as it hardens, arguably making it carbon negative. Full story from Aggregate Research.
"Novacems cement, based on magnesium silicates, not only requires much less heating, it also absorbs large amounts of CO2 as it hardens, making it carbon negative. "
It will be very interesting to see just what the EnviROI of this new product might be, but it sounds to me like it could be a BIG winner, not just for Novacem, but also for the environment.
The clue is in the headline
Rubbish answers
Looks like the box ticking and target meeting is going great already.
Shame about the enviROI.
I still think reduction and reuse might be better than mnay of the efforts devoted to recycling.
Looks like the box ticking and target meeting is going great already.
Shame about the enviROI.
I still think reduction and reuse might be better than mnay of the efforts devoted to recycling.
New year. Happy?
Sitting in my thermals having got bored staring at the ceiling since pre-dawn.
Jet lag is no fun. And switching off the central heating during a freeze maybe was not a smart move.
We arrived back on New Year's Eve having been t'other side of the planet for a few weeks.
The plan had been that we'd spend a family Xmas here that worked on all sorts of levels, eco and financial, as Mama & Kong Kong were meant to come here, representing a 50% reduction to planet and pocket.
Sadly Mama having a heart attack kind of threw a spanner in those plans, and new ones had to be made quick-smart.
Anyway, she is recovering well, we'd like to think in some measure to having her dearest nearer, so it was worth it. Sorry if things went very quiet.
But I'd like to take this opportunity to again thank Dave of Solarventi for keeping the blog ticking over so well while I was away. Much appreciated.
So... what have we come back to?
Looking at this, it may be a New Year (Happy's all round), but I can't say that the prognosis for much by way of new thinking to improve things seems much in evidence as yet...
Indy - Climate scientists: it's time for 'Plan B'
Read the piece, and then the comments. This is what the best of our governments, scientists and media can come up with to inspire the public in 2009 (OK, it's just a paper in a country, but I have seen little else of not so far)????!
My resolution... a lot less talk; a lot more doing. That may well mean less blogging, but it is hard to resist:)
Indy - What can we do to save our planet?
Gaurdian - Climate change policies failing, Nasa scientist warns Obama
Gaurdian - 95 months and counting
Jet lag is no fun. And switching off the central heating during a freeze maybe was not a smart move.
We arrived back on New Year's Eve having been t'other side of the planet for a few weeks.
The plan had been that we'd spend a family Xmas here that worked on all sorts of levels, eco and financial, as Mama & Kong Kong were meant to come here, representing a 50% reduction to planet and pocket.
Sadly Mama having a heart attack kind of threw a spanner in those plans, and new ones had to be made quick-smart.
Anyway, she is recovering well, we'd like to think in some measure to having her dearest nearer, so it was worth it. Sorry if things went very quiet.
But I'd like to take this opportunity to again thank Dave of Solarventi for keeping the blog ticking over so well while I was away. Much appreciated.
So... what have we come back to?
Looking at this, it may be a New Year (Happy's all round), but I can't say that the prognosis for much by way of new thinking to improve things seems much in evidence as yet...
Indy - Climate scientists: it's time for 'Plan B'
Read the piece, and then the comments. This is what the best of our governments, scientists and media can come up with to inspire the public in 2009 (OK, it's just a paper in a country, but I have seen little else of not so far)????!
My resolution... a lot less talk; a lot more doing. That may well mean less blogging, but it is hard to resist:)
Indy - What can we do to save our planet?
Gaurdian - Climate change policies failing, Nasa scientist warns Obama
Gaurdian - 95 months and counting
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)