Hmn... fishy.
I am often moved to let things speak from themslves.
These two headlines from today's Indy might well serve:
Carbon cuts 'only give 50/50 chance of saving planet'*
followed by:
Darling vetoes plans for green revolution in snub to Mandelson
And this is... er... leadership? I might also add that these two pieces are tucked away on the environment section of a very minor broadsheet of limited readership, while hammer threast to stricken celebs preoccupy many more.
* Again breaking my 'no climate change' rule, I read the comments. I also read this. No wonder few have a clue what to think, and are rather put off finding out... and especially asking questions.
