It's a new term I am playing with for things that seem to be fine in a 'why not?' way, but seem to have also been accorded a clunky bit of green in the process to , er, 'help'.
And this is a terrible example by being actually the exact reverse.
Driving instructors get green light from DSA to teach students 'eco-safety'
It's a bit of green with a clunky bit of 'why not?' attached.
Thing is, I am not sure it is serving the message of either too well by being so clunky.
I can get my head around driving safely, and being taught how to be even more so. I can also sort of get an eco-version, though much is plain common sense, but a few I have read about (Not here) might save a bit of gas but are certainly not helping safety at all.
But all in all, if I ever hear 'Eco-safety' like this, I'll ru... drive a mile... fast.
Good job I am not being asked to do another test... yet.
Times - Eco-safe driving: more lessons, more money - All becomes clear. And gives sensible green advocacy and even steeper slope to surmount... in 3rd, of course.
Newsnight - Post 3.
Junkk.com promotes fun, reward-based e-practices, sharing oodles of info in objective, balanced ways. But we do have personal opinions, too! Hence this slightly ‘off of site, top of mind' blog by Junkk Male Peter. Hopefully still more ‘concerned mates’ than 'do this... or else' nannies, with critiques seen as constructive or of a more eyebrow-twitching ‘Oh, really?!' variety. Little that’s green can be viewed only in black and white.
Showing posts with label GREEN HALO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GREEN HALO. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)