.... are all the prospective guests traveling there by sailboat?
I can't help asking this. Starting eco-friendly holiday resorts seems to be becoming all the rage at the moment, as this from the Sydney Morning Herald exemplifies. It just seems rather incongruous that the only way of reaching Branson's proposed resort on Mosquito Island will be to fly there.
Perhaps they will only be using Virgin aircraft powered solely on bio-fuel?
Junkk.com promotes fun, reward-based e-practices, sharing oodles of info in objective, balanced ways. But we do have personal opinions, too! Hence this slightly ‘off of site, top of mind' blog by Junkk Male Peter. Hopefully still more ‘concerned mates’ than 'do this... or else' nannies, with critiques seen as constructive or of a more eyebrow-twitching ‘Oh, really?!' variety. Little that’s green can be viewed only in black and white.
Showing posts with label BRANSON. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BRANSON. Show all posts
Friday, July 04, 2008
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Space, the final affront?
Hawking to get brief experience of weightlessness on space flight
As an eminent scientist, one can only presume he will be taking his place to further our understanding of the planet and the changes it faces, say, in climate.
If it were just space tourism or a cheap PR gimmick it would be harder to justify as I doubt this thing is powered by rubber bands or even biodiesel.
As an eminent scientist, one can only presume he will be taking his place to further our understanding of the planet and the changes it faces, say, in climate.
If it were just space tourism or a cheap PR gimmick it would be harder to justify as I doubt this thing is powered by rubber bands or even biodiesel.
Saturday, February 24, 2007
The richer are different to you and I. They attract more leeches.
I stumbled across this.
I almost wished I hadn't. Almost.
Beam me up, Sir Richard... why space tourism is no longer a sci-fi fantasy
Well, golly. How sooooooper, for you.
And any of this serves anyone, especially the planet... how?
Sickening.
Don't pity me on Petit St Vincent
I almost wished I hadn't. Almost.
Beam me up, Sir Richard... why space tourism is no longer a sci-fi fantasy
Well, golly. How sooooooper, for you.
And any of this serves anyone, especially the planet... how?
Sickening.
Don't pity me on Petit St Vincent
Saturday, February 10, 2007
... on the ridiculous
Branson Offers $25 Million to Remove Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
Taking the point about counter-productivity, it is however worth considering that examples are good things to be set.
While Richard Branson is simply one of many airfleet owners (and got a lot of PR from his towing them to the runway and claims about bio-kerosene... which seem to have passed into history) at least accepting 'things need to be done' (and, at least, putting some money where his mouth is), I would point out that he is also something to do with sticking half a dozen rich tourists in a rocket to look down on the planet they just pushed a smidge further to oblivion. I write this on the presumption that the intended propellant will be greenhouse gas-creating in its consumption.
If it's by catapult I'll apologise.
Speaking as one a tad put off by such antics, I do wonder if the creation of a green elite ('You may call me Nobel' Al, Tony 'it's not really practical not to when I'm hitting the lecture circuit' ' Blair, 'My other car is a Prius' Anycleb, etc) who 'need' to fly the world to spread their message 'as it's their job', may not be having the level of inspiration that is intended on those not so blessed with the fame/money luxuries of choice?
Having watched Total Recall, I'm a tad dubious about stuffing big blocks of goo under the ground, in case they leak back.
For now I think I'll go for the tree thing. Sounds promising. Unless some carb-con credit traders decide to horn in on the deal. Whoops, I think they already have...
Taking the point about counter-productivity, it is however worth considering that examples are good things to be set.
While Richard Branson is simply one of many airfleet owners (and got a lot of PR from his towing them to the runway and claims about bio-kerosene... which seem to have passed into history) at least accepting 'things need to be done' (and, at least, putting some money where his mouth is), I would point out that he is also something to do with sticking half a dozen rich tourists in a rocket to look down on the planet they just pushed a smidge further to oblivion. I write this on the presumption that the intended propellant will be greenhouse gas-creating in its consumption.
If it's by catapult I'll apologise.
Speaking as one a tad put off by such antics, I do wonder if the creation of a green elite ('You may call me Nobel' Al, Tony 'it's not really practical not to when I'm hitting the lecture circuit' ' Blair, 'My other car is a Prius' Anycleb, etc) who 'need' to fly the world to spread their message 'as it's their job', may not be having the level of inspiration that is intended on those not so blessed with the fame/money luxuries of choice?
Having watched Total Recall, I'm a tad dubious about stuffing big blocks of goo under the ground, in case they leak back.
For now I think I'll go for the tree thing. Sounds promising. Unless some carb-con credit traders decide to horn in on the deal. Whoops, I think they already have...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)