Saturday, July 14, 2007

Good question. Let's build on that.

Why not use the 420,000 empty homes to solve the housing crisis?

Makes about as much sense as fudging about obsessing about plastic bags, 4x4s and carbon offset schemes when every year deforestation accounts for more carbon consequence (in terms of 'sink') than the US produces (as emissions).

Priorities, anyone? Prevention better than cure?

It's all about seeming to do things than actually doing anything worthwhile these days.

Surely repair or restoration can be accorded value in the target-obsessed, and rewarding political cultures of today.

No comments: