Just for fun, I popped a comment, somewhat tongue in cheek, into the Andrew Marr show comments section, after a rather, how to say, 'less than challenging' interview with Ken Livingstone. Just to see if they could tell when someone is being utterly ironic, and highlight the value (at least here), of such moderated comments when all you need to attribute is a name and location.
Don't know why they bother with any pretence, when they could pretty much write 'em themselves.
Anyway, it's good to know the London Mayoral leadership will be guided by the likes of the BBC, based not on celebrity or gesture politics or personality attacks, but with the actual records, words and deeds of the candidates and those they have surrounding them investigated thoroughly.
Or, as I neglected to add in my initial post, should I perhaps influence the moderators on its inclusion... not.
Bless.
'Awesome show today. Andrew really took to task and nailed Mr. Livingstone on all his claims, whilst teasing out the substantive issues that truly matter in helping voters make informed political decisions.
Peter, UK'
Mind you, you can never have enough 'support': What's at stake An interesting insight into the value of agenda-driven media (both right and left)
No comments:
Post a Comment