It's a new term I am playing with for things that seem to be fine in a 'why not?' way, but seem to have also been accorded a clunky bit of green in the process to , er, 'help'.
And this is a terrible example by being actually the exact reverse.
Driving instructors get green light from DSA to teach students 'eco-safety'
It's a bit of green with a clunky bit of 'why not?' attached.
Thing is, I am not sure it is serving the message of either too well by being so clunky.
I can get my head around driving safely, and being taught how to be even more so. I can also sort of get an eco-version, though much is plain common sense, but a few I have read about (Not here) might save a bit of gas but are certainly not helping safety at all.
But all in all, if I ever hear 'Eco-safety' like this, I'll ru... drive a mile... fast.
Good job I am not being asked to do another test... yet.
Times - Eco-safe driving: more lessons, more money - All becomes clear. And gives sensible green advocacy and even steeper slope to surmount... in 3rd, of course.
Newsnight - Post 3.
No comments:
Post a Comment