I have no problem with reasonable expenditures of pretty much anything in the cause of science.
Get a rich lard-a**se a better view... less so.
I’d like a ticket to New York by hypersonic space rocket, please
"The two organisations would research hybrid rocket motors, which
use both solid and liquid fuel and are safer and more efficient than
solid fuel rocket engines."
Just asking, but by 'more efficient' what is meant by that?
Will it mean a kilo of person or cargo will get to the destination
for a lower carbon commitment?
Or not?
And if not, this is a commitment to global warming how exactly?
Gush, gush journalism at its best.
No comments:
Post a Comment