Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Old King Coal's comeback?

Is ol' Golden Brown's first major decision going to revive Old King Coal? A decision that could "lock Britain into the same centralised, inefficient power system that wastes two-thirds of the energy going into it as heat up the cooling towers." Not to mention a decision that would mean that the UK would entirely miss it's emission targets by a mile.

I somehow missed the original article in Sunday's Observer, but this from The Guardian CIF is a fascinating, albeit sobering, read. Should the UK break with tradition and radically transform energy production or should we re-awaken and revive Old King Coal?

"Gordon Brown has been handed a historic opportunity to break from Blair's confused and fragmented approach to energy generation. He could revolutionise our energy system by implementing renewables, energy efficiency and combined-heat-and-power (CHP) on an unprecedented scale."

So which way will he go? I hope it is not the case, but my guess is that short termism and what is perceived as the 'cheap' option will win the day yet again, almost certainly to the detriment of future generations.

If we start building new coal fired power stations, especially without utilising clean burn and carbon sequestration technologies, the UK will be taking an enormous retrograde step. Milliband would never have concurred with this - I'm beginning to wonder whether he was he moved (we all thought he was promoted but maybe it was just sideways?) to pave the way for an unpalatable decision?

I hope not. And as the first comment posted says - "fingers crossed"!

Addendum:

If Ol' Golden DOES opt for the radical approach and includes for a major expansion of renewables, I hope he's aware that some renewable technology is getting quite difficult to get hold of! According to this from The Guardian, there is now a worldwide shortage of wind turbines.

6 comments:

Emma said...

Amen.

Emma said...

A welcome new addition, I believe, to our merry crew, with some tasty factual input to chew upon. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

As E.ON and CHP are mentioned in in the Guardian's story, it's work having a look at E-On's website, where it shows that some of their existing CHP plant doesn't generate useable heat, which in practice means that it is just a normal power station...

Lawrence

Emma said...

It would be funny if it wasn't... oh well.

I'm sure they have lovely ads with sprigs of mint in them, and lots of super offsetting plans.

Why does the expression 'raking over old coals' resonate?

Dave said...

If E.ON are claiming that CHP plants that don't produce any usable heat are beneficial to the environment and are getting lauded for it, as well as (and I really hope not) got subsidised for building it, that's horrendous, bordering on the fraudulent.

It's greenscam of the worst sort!

Emma said...

But at least they have this dead spiffy ad about windmills which, unless I have missed the point, seems to be saying that they are using energy to blow more wind inland!