Green solutions to recession
The environment is more important than ever and its campaigners must ditch those fancy buzzwords
Couldn't agree more with most of the sentiments expressed (by author and posters).
But when dealing with a public whose plate is already quite full, and not that attractive, I'd also advocate (even though in many cases it may not be easy, if indeed possible) less bathing in guilt, scare, threat and nanny, especially from comfortably funded, well-travelled pedestals. Hence quoting the positive, proactive ideas such as the insulation aspect of the Green New Deal is more than welcome.
So long as it's appreciated that a wee bit of pragmatic honesty might also not go amiss, either.
Tough times can indeed require tough talk and maybe tougher solutions, but let's remember that not all that is green can or should be viewed only in black and white, and while much that is green is good, there are many areas where a degree of caution may still serve communications, establishment of trust with the public/consumer, and our kids' futures just as well as a more typical default 'ban this/build that' demand.
Very often the enviROI can be tricky one to assess. But when it's proven - without 'twiddly bits' (subsidies, idealised deliverables, impossible maintenance commitments, wistful international cooperations, etc) included or avoided to 'help' make things seem more attractive, but with clear advantages to planet and (hopefully, in time) pocket clearly spelled out - the sell to the individual facing everything from pay cuts to cost of living hikes might not be so tricky.
Or... keep on with what most have been doing 'til now. I'm sure it can be argued that it's all been good stuff, but I'm not sure that to date many are yet buying what's been tried so far. So maybe a change could indeed be in order. It might still take an impressive shift in mindset in some quarters, though.
Junkk.com promotes fun, reward-based e-practices, sharing oodles of info in objective, balanced ways. But we do have personal opinions, too! Hence this slightly ‘off of site, top of mind' blog by Junkk Male Peter. Hopefully still more ‘concerned mates’ than 'do this... or else' nannies, with critiques seen as constructive or of a more eyebrow-twitching ‘Oh, really?!' variety. Little that’s green can be viewed only in black and white.
Friday, December 05, 2008
"Any GM crops in this?"
"No sir, we don't use GM food sources at all in any of our products!"
Under breath, so as not to be heard - "we only use radiation modified crops".
Now I'd heard about radiation modification, but didn't realise just how widespread and what big business it had become. It seems that the use of mutagens can accelerate natural selection processes dramatically. And many of us have almost certainly being eating radiation modified foodstuffs for quite a while.
Some 30% of the Mekong Delta's one million hectares of rice-growing area is planted with VND95-20, a radiation modified species, which is resistant to saline conditions.
Despite some of the rather worrying terminology used (mutants, induced mutation, Gamma rays!) this technology has been around for donkey's years and yet seems to have eluded the radar of the world's NIMBYs.
Full story from IrinNews - very interesting stuff - looks like it could certainly help in a world with far too many mouths to feed.
Under breath, so as not to be heard - "we only use radiation modified crops".
Now I'd heard about radiation modification, but didn't realise just how widespread and what big business it had become. It seems that the use of mutagens can accelerate natural selection processes dramatically. And many of us have almost certainly being eating radiation modified foodstuffs for quite a while.
Some 30% of the Mekong Delta's one million hectares of rice-growing area is planted with VND95-20, a radiation modified species, which is resistant to saline conditions.
Despite some of the rather worrying terminology used (mutants, induced mutation, Gamma rays!) this technology has been around for donkey's years and yet seems to have eluded the radar of the world's NIMBYs.
Full story from IrinNews - very interesting stuff - looks like it could certainly help in a world with far too many mouths to feed.
CATEGORY - XMAS Fare
Christmas is coming, the geese (well everyone making a green buck) are going to get fat...
I have decided to kick off a festive thread with things that pass my way that can spread the cheer... and lighten the load:
General Tips
Gaurdian - A-Z of tips for a green Christmas
Cards
Send an e-card this Christmas with Envirowise - not reviewed as yet
Campaign aims to recycle 100m Christmas cards - still unsure what's wrong with the weekly kerbside recycle bin. But hey-ho, let's pop off to the supermarket then!
Gift tags - I'm doing/have done a separate blog on this to attempt to address the various other eco considerations. So this is just a home DIY link that does still use power, ink and paper.
Gifts
Guardian - Avoiding unsustainable Christmas gifts - nice in theory. Do they have kids? Kids who do not watch TV? Who do not have friends? But some nice ideas as you 'de-tune'. I must say the poster who suggested they don't use the same paper to flog coffee makers that use individual plastic pots has a point.
Guardian - Should I send a cow this Christmas?
Lights
Guardian - Low-carbon Christmas lights
Online
Recycling website offers free Christmas presents - No URL, but I'm sure it's track-downable
Trees
Recycle your Christmas tree - our falsie has done us 15 years and counting, mind
Guardian - NEW - Oh Christmas tree, oh Christmas tree
As always, if you'd like to share, let me know and I'll add 'em here too.
Ho, ho, ho.
I have decided to kick off a festive thread with things that pass my way that can spread the cheer... and lighten the load:
General Tips
Gaurdian - A-Z of tips for a green Christmas
Cards
Send an e-card this Christmas with Envirowise - not reviewed as yet
Campaign aims to recycle 100m Christmas cards - still unsure what's wrong with the weekly kerbside recycle bin. But hey-ho, let's pop off to the supermarket then!
Gift tags - I'm doing/have done a separate blog on this to attempt to address the various other eco considerations. So this is just a home DIY link that does still use power, ink and paper.
Gifts
Guardian - Avoiding unsustainable Christmas gifts - nice in theory. Do they have kids? Kids who do not watch TV? Who do not have friends? But some nice ideas as you 'de-tune'. I must say the poster who suggested they don't use the same paper to flog coffee makers that use individual plastic pots has a point.
Guardian - Should I send a cow this Christmas?
Lights
Guardian - Low-carbon Christmas lights
Online
Recycling website offers free Christmas presents - No URL, but I'm sure it's track-downable
Trees
Recycle your Christmas tree - our falsie has done us 15 years and counting, mind
Guardian - NEW - Oh Christmas tree, oh Christmas tree
As always, if you'd like to share, let me know and I'll add 'em here too.
Ho, ho, ho.
Thursday, December 04, 2008
Cars of the future?
An interesting look at vehicles of the future, from CNN.
Hmmmm. I didn't realise that Toyota was losing money on each Prius sold.
Hmmmm. I didn't realise that Toyota was losing money on each Prius sold.
Rain stopped play, ironically?
Will you join London's climate march?
Mixed feelings on this one. No, I won't be there, as it's in London. But if any readers are around... I have shared.
Also she rather raises a key point. Versus X-Factor, Strictly Come Dancing and the financial crisis, is calling all to a march, whilst very people power, democratic and all, really going to motivate the masses?
Maybe effort might be better spent emulating these despised icons of modern day life and finding something like them that does get more people to care and enough to join together in making a difference? I also have a slight 'thing' about being 'against' climate change, which really is a rather sloppy rallying call. The climate changes. What is a possible problem is the way 'we' are not helping it do so, in severity and frequency. Such muddled articulations can compromise a lot of goodwill and start pushing into agenda-driven activist territory.
Kinda cute that a poster needs to help a dedicated environmental beat journalist with making more of the whole where and when thing. Almost like she lives in her own little bubble with all her green mates, eh?
Mixed feelings on this one. No, I won't be there, as it's in London. But if any readers are around... I have shared.
Also she rather raises a key point. Versus X-Factor, Strictly Come Dancing and the financial crisis, is calling all to a march, whilst very people power, democratic and all, really going to motivate the masses?
Maybe effort might be better spent emulating these despised icons of modern day life and finding something like them that does get more people to care and enough to join together in making a difference? I also have a slight 'thing' about being 'against' climate change, which really is a rather sloppy rallying call. The climate changes. What is a possible problem is the way 'we' are not helping it do so, in severity and frequency. Such muddled articulations can compromise a lot of goodwill and start pushing into agenda-driven activist territory.
Kinda cute that a poster needs to help a dedicated environmental beat journalist with making more of the whole where and when thing. Almost like she lives in her own little bubble with all her green mates, eh?
Considerations
Commercial schools
Small businesses do face very tough times (letters, 1 December). I am not the owner of a small business but a former teacher, and I strongly object to the large banners hanging on the walls or railings of innumerable junior schools, announcing that the school is collecting vouchers for one supermarket chain or another. Schools are demeaning themselves by allowing themselves to be used as advertising hoardings, and schools should not disadvantage parents who are the owners of small businesses, by giving the impression that supermarkets are the obvious place to shop.
Or, should I say... dilemmas.
Having just, with our Voucher Tree efforts, been complicit in such an effort, This has given me cause to ponder.
I must say that, when we were doing the publicity, we considered using just such a poster on a railing to highlight our collection efforts, and everyone agreed that they did not deserve the publicity. Interesting that such a 'poster site' would usually be subject to a lot of planning, and even more money if not 'in a good cause'. It seems I am not the only one who can be cynical.
Small businesses do face very tough times (letters, 1 December). I am not the owner of a small business but a former teacher, and I strongly object to the large banners hanging on the walls or railings of innumerable junior schools, announcing that the school is collecting vouchers for one supermarket chain or another. Schools are demeaning themselves by allowing themselves to be used as advertising hoardings, and schools should not disadvantage parents who are the owners of small businesses, by giving the impression that supermarkets are the obvious place to shop.
Or, should I say... dilemmas.
Having just, with our Voucher Tree efforts, been complicit in such an effort, This has given me cause to ponder.
I must say that, when we were doing the publicity, we considered using just such a poster on a railing to highlight our collection efforts, and everyone agreed that they did not deserve the publicity. Interesting that such a 'poster site' would usually be subject to a lot of planning, and even more money if not 'in a good cause'. It seems I am not the only one who can be cynical.
Corked
A small piece on BBC Breakfast which typifies why I feel the whole sorry news, and especially science & tech.. er... environment* aspects are now less than worthless.
It was on.. corks.
In the (lightly nutty with a hint of spice) red corner we have a luvvie oenophile, for whom no bottle should cost less than £100 and be 'tainted'.
In the green corner, we have some bloke on about some bit of fauna being eradicated if the cork tree orchards are converted to other uses.
Now, I will leave out the majority of the 'debate', and my feelings on the matter, because my concern was with the conduct of the moderators.
Even when the two 'experts' were accusing each other of being plain wrong and/or being strangers to the truth, the response was 'oh, well, we're running out of time, you two sort it out later'.
No.... I was trying to arrive at a view and was left with an unresolved petty spat. This is supposed to be a news programme; not Jerry Springer.
* (there's been a name change, apparently. Why? While there are cross-overs they are distinct topics)
It was on.. corks.
In the (lightly nutty with a hint of spice) red corner we have a luvvie oenophile, for whom no bottle should cost less than £100 and be 'tainted'.
In the green corner, we have some bloke on about some bit of fauna being eradicated if the cork tree orchards are converted to other uses.
Now, I will leave out the majority of the 'debate', and my feelings on the matter, because my concern was with the conduct of the moderators.
Even when the two 'experts' were accusing each other of being plain wrong and/or being strangers to the truth, the response was 'oh, well, we're running out of time, you two sort it out later'.
No.... I was trying to arrive at a view and was left with an unresolved petty spat. This is supposed to be a news programme; not Jerry Springer.
* (there's been a name change, apparently. Why? While there are cross-overs they are distinct topics)
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
Greenhouse gas update
All this greenhouse gas argument; is it all a load of hot air?
Well, not according to this from NatureNews, which indicates that levels of greenhouse gases are continuing to rise, and are doing so in line with the IPCC's oft maligned forecasts.
And from the same source, an article on how Methane is released from areas of tundra even after the start of the winter re-freeze.
OK, we simply do not know what the future impacts might be, but does anyone else, like me, find such facts and figures rather disturbing?
Well, not according to this from NatureNews, which indicates that levels of greenhouse gases are continuing to rise, and are doing so in line with the IPCC's oft maligned forecasts.
And from the same source, an article on how Methane is released from areas of tundra even after the start of the winter re-freeze.
OK, we simply do not know what the future impacts might be, but does anyone else, like me, find such facts and figures rather disturbing?
Yet another species extinction....
....appears to have occurred. This time the Australian white lemuroid possum. Full story from the Telegraph.
Now (as I sit and freeze in my under-insulated office, with snow lying on the ground outside and a minimum of -4.5C last night) whether you believe in anthropogenic caused [or enhanced] global warming or not, it is clear that something is happening to our little lump of rock, and it don't seem to be too good.
Now (as I sit and freeze in my under-insulated office, with snow lying on the ground outside and a minimum of -4.5C last night) whether you believe in anthropogenic caused [or enhanced] global warming or not, it is clear that something is happening to our little lump of rock, and it don't seem to be too good.
Zero-carbon homes
These don't appear to be doing too well at the moment according to this from EDIE.
Just 15 new homes that meet the Gov's definition of zero-carbon have been built in the last 12 months, despite the backing of £15 Million of taxpayers money.
Hmmm, perhaps they need to think about redefining just what zero-carbon actually means?
Meanwhile, there are those (see this piece from AlterNet.org) who think that total decarbonisation is the only possible way forward. Sounds rather overtly radical to me, but what do I know?
Just 15 new homes that meet the Gov's definition of zero-carbon have been built in the last 12 months, despite the backing of £15 Million of taxpayers money.
Hmmm, perhaps they need to think about redefining just what zero-carbon actually means?
Meanwhile, there are those (see this piece from AlterNet.org) who think that total decarbonisation is the only possible way forward. Sounds rather overtly radical to me, but what do I know?
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
Surprised?
At what?
That the EU has backed down on the CO2 emission targets for new vehicles.
Well, I, for one, am not at all. It just shows what power big automotive industries still have over our Pols, elected or otherwise.
That the EU has backed down on the CO2 emission targets for new vehicles.
Well, I, for one, am not at all. It just shows what power big automotive industries still have over our Pols, elected or otherwise.
- CO2 goals relaxed
- Car makers now have until 2015 to hit 130g/km
- Niche car makers such as Jaguar Land Rover exempt
One man's myth...
Worth sharing... but I suggest with cranked eyebrows cocked if necessary.
The 10 big energy myths
Especially as there is a book available.
Some are well worth noting. But, as with all things, just becuase there are clear cases of a good enviROI, it does not mean one does not challenge all others to prove themselves first.
The 10 big energy myths
Especially as there is a book available.
Some are well worth noting. But, as with all things, just becuase there are clear cases of a good enviROI, it does not mean one does not challenge all others to prove themselves first.
Fancy being one of the 3,000?
UK set to trial 'smart fridges' - 3,000 refrigerators, which adapt their power use to the ebb and flow of demand, are to be given away
Me too.
Thing is, there doesn't seem to be any mention of how 'we' apply.
Maybe it's 'in-house'... as in the houses of those sharing the burden along with 'us'?
We have a smart freezer already. It accumulates food way past safety dates, then frosts up and leaves the door ajar so it all spoils and we throw it away.
Me too.
Thing is, there doesn't seem to be any mention of how 'we' apply.
Maybe it's 'in-house'... as in the houses of those sharing the burden along with 'us'?
We have a smart freezer already. It accumulates food way past safety dates, then frosts up and leaves the door ajar so it all spoils and we throw it away.
Monday, December 01, 2008
Logic Free?
Or, at least consistency.
As domestic sales are trying to be boosted, and with an in theory commitment to the environment, I am unsure as to why the government and BBC is promoting flying overseas to buy iPods and bring back 16 litres of extra weight, duty free, in a plane.
Indy - Duty-free allowances double, thanks to Brown
Newsnight -
I'm still getting to grips with the logic of trumpeting encouragement to fly overseas to bring back an extra 16 kilos as an assist to economy and environment....
"Bing bong! We will shortly be bringing around the Duty Free bowser. Please have your credit cards ready. An additional irony-free amount may be deducted for lugging all this extra on board to satisfy newly-created demand, and then pad a few carbon credit schemes concocted between Brussels, Westminster and the City. Thank yew! Bing bong"
It must all add up somewhere.
I was an engineer once. Then I became an ad man (sadly no qualifications that get you in or on TV news commenting on 'stuff' in any form).
But I do have an ability to be inspired by substance, and also sniff out when the smoke and mirrors are being deployed (and not to focus the power of illumination).
At the moment... erring on the latter.
My poor kids.
Gaurdian - End of the party
This a brave, bold step and Gordon Brown is to be congratulated for taking it
Well, some might still see it that way.
Much like this glowing report, from another Friend of Gordon:
Duty-free allowances double, thanks to Brown
Now, remind me. How does flying to another country, buying their stuff and lugging an extra 16 kilos back here help our economy and the planet?
As domestic sales are trying to be boosted, and with an in theory commitment to the environment, I am unsure as to why the government and BBC is promoting flying overseas to buy iPods and bring back 16 litres of extra weight, duty free, in a plane.
Indy - Duty-free allowances double, thanks to Brown
Newsnight -
I'm still getting to grips with the logic of trumpeting encouragement to fly overseas to bring back an extra 16 kilos as an assist to economy and environment....
"Bing bong! We will shortly be bringing around the Duty Free bowser. Please have your credit cards ready. An additional irony-free amount may be deducted for lugging all this extra on board to satisfy newly-created demand, and then pad a few carbon credit schemes concocted between Brussels, Westminster and the City. Thank yew! Bing bong"
It must all add up somewhere.
I was an engineer once. Then I became an ad man (sadly no qualifications that get you in or on TV news commenting on 'stuff' in any form).
But I do have an ability to be inspired by substance, and also sniff out when the smoke and mirrors are being deployed (and not to focus the power of illumination).
At the moment... erring on the latter.
My poor kids.
Gaurdian - End of the party
This a brave, bold step and Gordon Brown is to be congratulated for taking it
Well, some might still see it that way.
Much like this glowing report, from another Friend of Gordon:
Duty-free allowances double, thanks to Brown
Now, remind me. How does flying to another country, buying their stuff and lugging an extra 16 kilos back here help our economy and the planet?
Friday, November 28, 2008
Oh Lor, summit all up
Faiths in climate change summit
I guess they have to meet somewhere to discuss and ...er..act (They aim to set a manifesto to encourage..). But really, I'd love to know the carbon consequence of all these 'summits'.
I wonder if Aunty has sent a team, too?
I guess they have to meet somewhere to discuss and ...er..act (They aim to set a manifesto to encourage..). But really, I'd love to know the carbon consequence of all these 'summits'.
I wonder if Aunty has sent a team, too?
Thinking of boxes... another way
It's been a dodgy week at the end of a dodgy month. Time for some levity.
'Thinking outside the box' is most despised business jargon
Of course, some us spend more time thinking about the box.
Pushing the envelope is evil
'Thinking outside the box' is most despised business jargon
Of course, some us spend more time thinking about the box.
Pushing the envelope is evil
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Or.... reuse?
Getting a bit frustrating banging on about other alternatives, but as Aunty has investigated...
Throw-away Britain
Service? Or meeting a target?
Addendum (from a thread):
'...this "empowerment" is a growing trend. Doing it yourself whilst the people that you pay to deliver a 'service' spend all their time "incentivising you" with chip and bin fines, cameras and ASBOS..'
[This] horrifying bin scheme is a manifestation of this "empowerment" - bullshit of course and the worst of all worlds. You pay for the service, do it yourself and have to endure bullying from the state.'
As pithy a summary as I have seen of how these new 'initiatives' are concocted, mis-promoted and, if history is judge, will be more effective at generating money then helping my kids' planetary futures.
I have to put my hand up and say I am a believer in some sort of incentive-based schemes that are, effectively, pay as you go/throw. But only if this contribution by the consumer/rate payer in money and effort is rewarded with consequent reductions in related areas.
Mind you, I was a young home owner who though the Poll Tax seemed relatively fair. But I guess that was 'different'.
How times have changed, and changed views.
Newsnight - An exchange that seems pertinent for now.
Waste not, want not.
Well put.
Reduce: don't buy so much tat in the first place - Agree, though being told to spend like there's no tomorrow is a wee bit contradictory at the 'mo.
Recycle: encourage easier and more widespread recycling facilities - Agree. Plus much better national connectivity, from logistics to communications. It doesn't help that I am hearing that recyclate is deemed to still count on EU targets as 'recycling' even if its quality is useless to those seeking to make something of it. Or see budgets of multimillion £'s being sunk in Charlotte St or SoHo to create 'awareness' levels that tick boxes and add to the bonuses of the quango directors and Ministers who commission them. This seems a direct conflict of interest.
Re-use: think of ways in which the packaging etc. can be re-used about your home. Agree. Especially if it can be designed-in to be second used. I might suggest that one, a namesake, exists already: Junkk.com
There are others of course, though mainly in the area of redirecting away from the landfill. Hence well of value. These are linked here
Alas, we seem to be losing that Blue Peter spirit that was so much a part of my childhood.
FWIW, Junkk.com has been described as 'Blue Peter on steroids'
With luck, by getting back to fun and reward over guilt, thread, nanny and fine, the general public may yet see merit, and profit, in getting back to make and mend. Especially in these crunchier, more eco-concerned times.
And maybe business will follow too. Who knows, the government and its various organs of efficiency might get on board, too.
Throw-away Britain
Service? Or meeting a target?
Addendum (from a thread):
'...this "empowerment" is a growing trend. Doing it yourself whilst the people that you pay to deliver a 'service' spend all their time "incentivising you" with chip and bin fines, cameras and ASBOS..'
[This] horrifying bin scheme is a manifestation of this "empowerment" - bullshit of course and the worst of all worlds. You pay for the service, do it yourself and have to endure bullying from the state.'
As pithy a summary as I have seen of how these new 'initiatives' are concocted, mis-promoted and, if history is judge, will be more effective at generating money then helping my kids' planetary futures.
I have to put my hand up and say I am a believer in some sort of incentive-based schemes that are, effectively, pay as you go/throw. But only if this contribution by the consumer/rate payer in money and effort is rewarded with consequent reductions in related areas.
Mind you, I was a young home owner who though the Poll Tax seemed relatively fair. But I guess that was 'different'.
How times have changed, and changed views.
Newsnight - An exchange that seems pertinent for now.
Waste not, want not.
Well put.
Reduce: don't buy so much tat in the first place - Agree, though being told to spend like there's no tomorrow is a wee bit contradictory at the 'mo.
Recycle: encourage easier and more widespread recycling facilities - Agree. Plus much better national connectivity, from logistics to communications. It doesn't help that I am hearing that recyclate is deemed to still count on EU targets as 'recycling' even if its quality is useless to those seeking to make something of it. Or see budgets of multimillion £'s being sunk in Charlotte St or SoHo to create 'awareness' levels that tick boxes and add to the bonuses of the quango directors and Ministers who commission them. This seems a direct conflict of interest.
Re-use: think of ways in which the packaging etc. can be re-used about your home. Agree. Especially if it can be designed-in to be second used. I might suggest that one, a namesake, exists already: Junkk.com
There are others of course, though mainly in the area of redirecting away from the landfill. Hence well of value. These are linked here
Alas, we seem to be losing that Blue Peter spirit that was so much a part of my childhood.
FWIW, Junkk.com has been described as 'Blue Peter on steroids'
With luck, by getting back to fun and reward over guilt, thread, nanny and fine, the general public may yet see merit, and profit, in getting back to make and mend. Especially in these crunchier, more eco-concerned times.
And maybe business will follow too. Who knows, the government and its various organs of efficiency might get on board, too.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Crisis, what...
Financial crisis? That's nothing
It's a shame The Grauniad seems to close comments early when they know what may follow.
As here...
Is Gordon Brown ready for this one?
I may have been moved to ask if he has been ready for anything so far.
It's a shame The Grauniad seems to close comments early when they know what may follow.
As here...
Is Gordon Brown ready for this one?
I may have been moved to ask if he has been ready for anything so far.
CATEGORY - The Two E's
I think this deserves its own category now.
For those who have seen it before, this refers to discussions or debates where the needs of the Environment might end up at odds with Economic drivers (I have often called this the two 'Ecos' before, but actually environment and ecology are distinct and, sadly if ironically, can also compete).
Greenbuzz - Taking Care of Business
Guardian - It's the economists, stupid - I'd have to say that, while opinions are fine, if I were not an economist, I'd tread a wee bit cautiously, especially on an open blog, telling those who are their business.
Indy - The eco-crunch: Can Britain still afford to go green? - And in case you wonder who is an eco-expert, they are in here, too. Apparently.
The Guardian - The green squeeze - Do read the comments.... they're free.
Times - Trade minister Lord Jones hits out at green tax on flights
Guardian - Will the Green New Deal deliver? - There are an awful lot of folk on an awful lot of pedestals telling those below what's good for 'em these days. Glad to be spending more time on doing stuff to help most of my day. Might help when the revolution comes.
The Register - The FDRs of Green explain the gentle art of planet saving
Real Climate - A worthwhile read: Bridging the divides
Guardian - Free trade breakdown
The Register - What's the cost of global warming?
Gaurdian - Green routes to growth
BBC - Climate law 'could cost billions' - Of course, it 'might' not.
Guardian - NEW - The green revolution postponed
For those who have seen it before, this refers to discussions or debates where the needs of the Environment might end up at odds with Economic drivers (I have often called this the two 'Ecos' before, but actually environment and ecology are distinct and, sadly if ironically, can also compete).
Greenbuzz - Taking Care of Business
Guardian - It's the economists, stupid - I'd have to say that, while opinions are fine, if I were not an economist, I'd tread a wee bit cautiously, especially on an open blog, telling those who are their business.
Indy - The eco-crunch: Can Britain still afford to go green? - And in case you wonder who is an eco-expert, they are in here, too. Apparently.
The Guardian - The green squeeze - Do read the comments.... they're free.
Times - Trade minister Lord Jones hits out at green tax on flights
Guardian - Will the Green New Deal deliver? - There are an awful lot of folk on an awful lot of pedestals telling those below what's good for 'em these days. Glad to be spending more time on doing stuff to help most of my day. Might help when the revolution comes.
The Register - The FDRs of Green explain the gentle art of planet saving
Real Climate - A worthwhile read: Bridging the divides
Guardian - Free trade breakdown
The Register - What's the cost of global warming?
Gaurdian - Green routes to growth
BBC - Climate law 'could cost billions' - Of course, it 'might' not.
Guardian - NEW - The green revolution postponed
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)